Thomson Reuters HighQ vs. TyMetrix 360°

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HighQ
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
TyMetrix 360°
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
TyMetrix® 360° is a SaaS-based e-Billing and Legal Matter Management software solution that allows users to manage all of their matters and legal invoices in one place. It is designed to be intuitive and simple to learn to help legal staff manage matters with ease, streamline daily activities, strengthen internal and external collaboration, and improve the management of outside counsel billing costs. Easy to use reporting gives teams visibility into their department’s performance, while…N/A
Pricing
Thomson Reuters HighQTyMetrix 360°
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HighQTyMetrix 360°
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Thomson Reuters HighQTyMetrix 360°
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
4% above category average
TyMetrix 360°
-
Ratings
Task Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Search9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
7% above category average
TyMetrix 360°
-
Ratings
Chat9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Thomson Reuters HighQ
9.4
2 Ratings
15% above category average
TyMetrix 360°
-
Ratings
Versioning10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Thomson Reuters HighQTyMetrix 360°
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
BQE CORE
BQE CORE
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
BQE CORE
BQE CORE
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQTyMetrix 360°
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(2 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Thomson Reuters HighQTyMetrix 360°
Likelihood to Recommend
Thomson Reuters
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
This product has no redeeming features that I have found in comparison to the many other eBilling "solutions" I have used. They have no incentive to improve it because they offer law firms a very expensive monthly subscription service to assist them in using the system. So, they are being paid by the insurance companies to force law firms to use TyMetrix and then TyMetrix turns around and collects a second fee from the law firms to do what should be easy to do in the first place.
Read full review
Pros
Thomson Reuters
  • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
  • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
  • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
  • I can think of no redeeming qualities of TyMetrix 360. It doesn't do anything as well as any other of the eBilling programs I have used.
Read full review
Cons
Thomson Reuters
  • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
  • Let's start with a basic one: When you click on the "My Matters" tab, you should get to see your matters. Instead, you have to click on "all matters" and then search for your matters. The "My Matters" tab is useless.
  • The help section is abysmal. It has improved slightly over the past three years, but they don't seem to understand the areas where users need help.
  • It should be easy to submit invoices in an eBilling program. The program already has all of the matter data (client ID, Matter ID, tax ID, billing rates for each attorney etc.) associated with the matter. That should not need to be included in the LEDES file submission. You should be able to submit an invoice that has only the time duration, attorney initials, Phase and Task Codes, expense or time identification, and description of work for each line item with the program then assigning the rest of the info: billing rate (based upon attorney initials) , timeslip total (duration times billing rate), total for invoice, attorney tax id , client ID, matter ID, etc.
  • The program only works with Internet Explorer or Chrome. Both are major security risks for a law firm and should not be used for submission of confidential information. The program needs to be updated to work with other browsers.
Read full review
Support Rating
Thomson Reuters
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Thomson Reuters
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
In addition to ASCENT and TyMetrix, I've used LegalExchange, BottomLine, Advocator, CounselLink and Allegient. TyMetrix is, by far, the worst of the bunch. Although none of them are great, the others are far more user friendly than TyMetrix.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Thomson Reuters
  • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
  • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
  • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer
  • The impact of this program on my law firm is entirely negative. I spend inordinate amounts of otherwise valuable billable time submitting my invoices. (I refuse to pay the exorbitant monthly subscription that will theoretically eliminate the user-unfriendly-ness of the product.
  • If you ae with an insurance company that is thinking of using this product, remember that we lawyers are your partners in defending your insureds. We don't object to you reviewing our bills and making sure that you are getting charged appropriately; but there are other eBilling solutions out there that won't be major headaches for the law firms on your panels. Get some lawyers to evaluate the eBilling programs you are considering and choose one that meets your needs without frustrating your law firms.
Read full review
ScreenShots