UserBob vs. UserReplay

some specific scenarios where UserBob may be suitable is for testing delivery apps, short trip apps like uber, clothing sales apps, and banking service apps where it is less suitable is for service apps or sites legal, medical, consulting, insurance sales, sale of products for vehicles, sale of houses, sale of construction materials.

Incentivized

Great for online businesses who are well established and want to refine their UX/site performance.

Incentivized

• Cheap, but high quality user testing.
• Bare bones - just the basics of what you need. It lets you customize questions, customize audiences, and then see results!
• Fast.

Incentivized

• Identifying an issue and quickly understanding what the financial impact is
• Seeing how users use and interact with your site, by device
• Reporting on custom events
• Quickly finding a session and replaying it, to watch it back.

Incentivized

• Haven't had any issues with UserBob.

• Having confidence in the reports/numbers it pulls
• No function to email out weekly/monthly reports.
• Insights are sometimes difficult to extract

Incentivized

UserTesting allows for better user segmentation that's not just based on the honor system of the user but UserBob is cheaper and it's quicker to get data back so it makes collecting data easy and fast so you can move quicker and experiment more. UserBob is great for a first audience or a general audience.

Incentivized

Very well, a similar but different system

Incentivized

• increase in electronic branch users
• Increased use of platforms by providers
• more credit card sales

Incentivized

• Confirmed our low basket abandonment

Incentivized