Pure Storage FlashArrayPricing

capacity is less than we agreed then they provide additional storage at no cost.

Positive impact is the cost savings on the SQL licensing due to the performance gain Negative impact is the array itself is very expensive … firmware upgrade. I believe this should be released every quarter. Very expensive to expand the disk capacity. 10

Pricing A more streamlined update process … obviously adds value to the solution. … Pure Storage FlashArray came up as being the most cost-effective

our storage arrays at all the datacenters. Pure was very aggressive in pricing to make sure we were able to replace our environment with enough space to

Price is high. … While expensive, Pure Storage is by far the best experience we have had with … as close to a perfect on-premises storage system as you can get and the value is off the charts. I would purchase additional ones and continue the support

It could be less expensive. Pure storage is not cheap. But, outside of price I cannot thing of a thing it is lacking.

Pure we have not had to migrate all our data to a new SAN because it was cheaper to buy a new array than to continue support on the existing. All of these … with more benefits and providing on-array software updates that provide value to our IT Team. … mark. One year of EMC support after year 5 on…

FlashArray. The NetApp array was low cost but lacked many of the features of the other two arrays. XtremeIO was more expensive than the Pure FlashArray solution … that can support a reasonable level of deduplication and compression. Most cost-effective when the workload supports data reduction. Data that cannot be &hell…

to scale array performance, reliability and performance, and a competitive cost point. Very good customer support and a collaborative team.

Pure Storage for all workloads except maybe long-term large storage, as the price point might be prohibitive, and a waste of the capabilities of the Pure Storage … Pure Storage is cheaper to run and maintain, much simpler to manage, and outperforms the competition

you get what you pay for and Pure is very competitive when it comes to pricing for features/value. Win-Win-Win!

We have been able to expand our storage at a great cost savings and still benefit from SSD speeds … nightmare and extremely expensive. Pure is low maintenance, relatively low cost, and efficient.

Love to see the price come down. We want more units for data replication. More details on the mobile … issues during changes / upgrades. Evergreen service makes budgeting and cost controls reliable and predictable. … Price Product Features Product Usability Product…

Exchange DB's. Its Dedupe is great and allows for lots of storage at a good price. … compared to Active Cluster. Pure outperforms EMC in spied, dedupe and overall cost.

Cost can be relatively high. Capacity increases only come in specific sizes (2 … not be appropriate for your environment - you can definitely get a ton of cheap capacity elsewhere. … years. While this is a good benefit, we have questioned whether it is a good value…

At the price point, it is hard to find somewhere it is not suited to be used. … It was massively cheaper than the old guard, EMC, HP … HP, IBM. And has performed as well if not better than their much more expensive products.

computed the TCO over 6+ years, we found that Pure Storage solutions would cost us less than comparable offerings from Dell, HP and other companies. In addition

replace our Pure FlashArray. There might be faster storage, there might be cheaper storage, there might be easier storage, but there is nothing that is as

Clearer pricing … deployment of VMs Good ROI if priced over 5 years + … Cheaper ROI and faster performance

The feature set at the given price point was unbeatable. From a performance perspective, NetApp and Nimble were

gives us a top of class storage solution but does so at a long-term support cost that is a fraction of other solutions.

Cost … to spend a lot of time managing our storage system. It is probably too expensive to be used as secondary or backup storage, but that is probably the case … really saved us valuable time. Ease of upgrade and flexibility to scale. Cost savings with less time management.…

Pure storage was cheaper and faster.

had that they don't. Haven't had one problem to complain about. Pretty expensive, but you get what you pay for...

Lower cost solutions for ROBO A NAS solution … Any use case for fast and reliable storage. If you can afford it I suggest using it everywhere