Overall Satisfaction with Canto
Canto is currently being used by our client's marketing department. I was involved in the selection process and implementation. The client was able to move from multiple on-premises drives and cloud storage services to one consolidated repository for their marketing assets. The client was able to move from relying on multiple folder structures to a comprehensive tagging and keywording organization system. They also shifted from spending much of their time searching for assets, sharing them, and receiving them to a self-serve model that enables collaboration and sharing of assets inside and outside their organization.
- Ease of use
- Configuration options
- Portals
- Unlimited guest (unlicensed) users
- Workflow
- Task assignment
- Five FTE reduction in marketing department
- 5TB of on-premises server upgrades, power, and maintenance saved
- Saved many, many hours of searching for files
We evaluated many products. Those that best met the needs of our clients were Canto and AssetBank. We found that MediaValet was overpriced for our clients. For organizations that would be looking to purchase significant amounts of licenses, MediaValet is a good option thanks to their pay-for-storage only pricing model. But, for smaller organizations that want to share externally with unlicensed users, we found that Canto and AssetBank were a better value, followed closely by Brandfolder.
Do you think Canto delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Canto's feature set?
Yes
Did Canto live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Canto go as expected?
No
Would you buy Canto again?
Yes