IBM API Connect is better but comes at a cost
Overall Satisfaction with IBM API Connect
API Connect is the main API gateway instrument we utilize for majority of our APIs. It provides discoverability, security, reuse and scalability we need with our interfaces. While the setup time is a bit high, it offers a consistent pipeline for our services. It allows us to provide the level of authentication and authorization, even in a hybrid environment.
Pros
- Security - well integrated with both AAD, Okta and TDS
- Reliability - ensures services are scaling well with load balancing
- Consistency - Allowed for a standardized way to host services across various platforms and tech stacks
Cons
- Steep learning curve - not sure why all IBM docs avoid pictures in their help documentation. Instead, everything is painfully described in words. Use pictures. Use short videos.
- Templates for repeatable API configurations will help speed up adoption.
- Consistent API lifecycle management
- Works smoothly with multiple user authentication mechanisms
- Expensive, leading us to look for alternate ways of hosting services.
- MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Kong Gateway Community (Open Source) and Apigee
IBM API CONNECT competitors have the following advantages:
- Cost advantage
- Better user pool
- Better documentation
- Easier onboarding
Trans are constantly evaluating if they can avoid vendor lock-in with IBM.
Do you think IBM API Connect delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with IBM API Connect's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM API Connect live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM API Connect go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM API Connect again?
No


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation