Sage Intacct versus the Nightmare Legacy System
Overall Satisfaction with Sage Intacct
I'm currently using Sage Intacct at our corporate office as our overall accounting solution. We are also building reports to be utilized for sales tracking.
Our company is wholly owned by a foreign entity and in the past, we used a archaic accounting solution that was over 15 years old and upon acquisition, manually transferred revenue information over to the system that the parent uses which too was an outdated system that was very difficult to navigate. Implementing Sage allows to utilize one cloud based solution.
Our company is wholly owned by a foreign entity and in the past, we used a archaic accounting solution that was over 15 years old and upon acquisition, manually transferred revenue information over to the system that the parent uses which too was an outdated system that was very difficult to navigate. Implementing Sage allows to utilize one cloud based solution.
Pros
- Using Basecamp during implementation is a very strong attribute as several members of the Sage team assigned can address our issue.
- It is easy to process transactions
- The ability to create custom reports
- The availability of a sandbox to test the system.
Cons
- The way transactions post to the General Ledger balance sheet needs work. Simply stated, if an AP bill is posted over 3 departments, Sage posts to the balance sheet in 3 separate lines. If several A/P bills are paid using one check, Sage posts each invoice payment as a debit to cash instead of the total payment. Sage should be able to post the balance sheet in summation and not like a subsidiary ledger. If one wants to see the details of a payment, then we should be able to drill down to see what bills a payment covers. I don't want to have to jump through hoops to to see a simple transaction on the G/L when the subsidiary ledgers have the detailed information.
- If a customer pays multiple invoices with one payment, Sage posts the receipt of cash (either in unapplied payments or Cash) by invoice and not by the total payment. This is also a problem.
- When using a 3rd party customer payment solution, (one recommended by Sage) when processing a settlement at the end of the day, it posts from unapplied payments into cash by invoice line item and not by payment total. You have to click on the amount to see the total deposit. This is completely backwards. You can't look at the Cash G/L to see the actual deposit totals vs invoice payments. At the end of the day, once all of the receipts are posted, the settlement should be able to do one debit to Cash and one credit to Unapplied Payments. The payment processor stated that this is a Sage problem. When attempting to ask support or our implementation team for assistance, I was told that Sage doesn't do this. This is a basic accounting function. No amount of changing the report filters allowed me to view a single line deposit entry for the total.
- The vanilla financial reports still could use some work. Simple reports don't total for YTD. For example, the R-12 P&L should have a YTD total column. This is throughout the reports that come with Sage. Also, a basic one month P&L should be included without having to go an create a custom report. Currently, if a detail or summary P&L is run, it automatically runs the previous 3 months from the "As of Date" and even then it doesn't have a total column.
- TIME! Sage Intacct has been a huge time saver over our legacy systems.
- The ease of being able to quickly run a financial statement has been great.
- Drill down features when looking at a line item on the financials has had a positive impact.
We have benefited from this automation compared to our legacy system. The ease of emailing invoices to our customers has been a tremendous time saver. By being able to implement a customer payment portal, it has put the control in our customer's hands eliminating risk for us as well as allowing us to receive payments promptly instead of mailing invoices.
We haven't used however,I can see our parent organization truly benefiting from this. They are waiting to see how my end to end implementation goes.
Years ago, I worked for Oracle and after, I did a rapid Oracle Financials implementation for a resort company with 31 different hotels. That went well. Over the years, I have had experience when I needed Oracle support and it was horrible. That was the main reason I chose Sage Intacct.
Throughout the Sage Intact process, Sage support has been great.
Throughout the Sage Intact process, Sage support has been great.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation