What users are saying about
335 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.8 out of 101
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Amazon Web Services

Amazon Web Services is well suited for companies or organizations that need to run specific applications or virtual services on servers. The cost-per-server ratio makes this ideal for testing and live deployment scenarios. It is especially ideal for smaller to medium size IT development teams. If you are looking to just set up a website, for example, AWS may not be ideal unless you are having it custom built.
Nathan Sichilongo profile photo

Oracle API Platform Cloud

There are countless solutions and needs in the marketplace. Some solutions are straight forward, other highly complicated and innovative. From my perspective, our platform and application is highly complex and innovative, with many "one-off" features.
Krishna T profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)

Amazon Web Services
8.3
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
Amazon Web Services
8.9
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Dynamic scaling
Amazon Web Services
9.1
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Elastic load balancing
Amazon Web Services
8.7
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Pre-configured templates
Amazon Web Services
7.6
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Monitoring tools
Amazon Web Services
7.5
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Pre-defined machine images
Amazon Web Services
7.9
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Operating system support
Amazon Web Services
7.9
Oracle API Platform Cloud
Security controls
Amazon Web Services
8.4
Oracle API Platform Cloud

Platform-as-a-Service

Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
6.0
Ease of building user interfaces
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
6.0
Scalability
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
7.0
Platform management overhead
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
4.0
Workflow engine capability
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
6.0
Platform access control
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
7.0
Services-enabled integration
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
7.0
Development environment creation
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
6.0
Development environment replication
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
6.0
Issue monitoring and notification
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
5.0
Issue recovery
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
7.0
Upgrades and platform fixes
Amazon Web Services
Oracle API Platform Cloud
5.0

Pros

  • Customer service: There's no beating AWS for their customer service. They've clearly been trained to lisetn to understand the core issue you've called them for. Our customers satisfaction is in direct correlation to what AWS can deliver, so this is the #1 reason we chose and have stayed with AWS for 8 years.
  • Agility: We have demand cycles that fluctuate, largely without alot of notice. It doesn't take more than 1 phone call to address any increase in bandwidth. In fact, they're more likely to reach out to us with any enhancements we might need or shoul be considering.
  • Performance: We've never experienced a slowdown, nor failure - even when there've been internet-wide issues. They're always innovating based on every customer, and we all benefit from Bezos vision of what infrastructure technology should do for business.
Jackie Bassett profile photo
  • Oracles Cloud is endlessly variable, and endlessly expandable.
  • These are qualities that we needed in our platform. Oracle's Name in business was also an important aspect of our decision.
  • The most important "like" is the support. Oracle Backs up its cloud with a technical expertise that I believe is second to none.
Krishna T profile photo

Cons

  • AWS is really difficult to use if you do not have any training.
  • You need to create your own backups. I cannot verify this, but a co-worker of mine stated that he did now create a back, and lost several items.
  • It is very expensive for everyday use. AWS is for people that have done the research, and know exactly what they need. These instances are not toys, believe me.
Michael Timms profile photo
  • Planned maintenance. Oracle has certain days it schedules maintenance. We have been speaking with Oracle executives about the inability to schedule maintenance on days that are custom to the client.
Krishna T profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Amazon Web Services9.4
Based on 10 answers
Janova was built utilizing the EC2 infrastructure and with Amazon's cost continuing to drop and with the capability to be billed hourly there is no reason to switch to a different platform.
Brian Lusenhop profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

Amazon Web Services9.0
Based on 3 answers
Easy to use/learning curve. If you are new to the use of cloud storage, AWS is your entry point. If you have experience in that field, AWS is the way to go.
Miguel Angel Merino Vega profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Reliability and Availability

Amazon Web Services9.0
Based on 1 answer
Availability is very good, with the exception of occasional spectacular outages.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Performance

AWS does not provide the raw performance that you can get by building your own custom infrastructure. However, it is often the case that the benefits of specialized, high-performance hardware do not necessarily outweigh the significant extra cost and risk. Performance as perceived by the user is very different from raw throughput.
No photo available
No answers on this topic

Support

Amazon Web Services3.0
Based on 3 answers
Neutral, no experience with either.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Implementation

Amazon Web Services10.0
Based on 3 answers
The API's were very well documented and was Janova's main point of entry into the services.
Brian Lusenhop profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

AWS is usually the most affordable between GC, AWS, and Azure. If I was using a Windows machines only environment, I would go with Azure and for any other setup I would go with Amazon Web Services. For the record, AWS has been around longer than the others too
Michael Timms profile photo
Krishna T profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Positive: Faster provisioning of infrastructure.
  • Positive: Lower upfront costs.
  • Negative: Integration of AWS to enterprise apps.
Billy Tiangco profile photo
  • For ROI, my advice would be to stay the course. It will take longer than you think and cost more than you expect.
Krishna T profile photo

Pricing Details

Amazon Web Services

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Oracle API Platform Cloud

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details