BookStack vs. iManage Work

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BookStack
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
iManage Work
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
iManage Work is a document management solution formerly known as HP Worksite. iManage was divested from Hewlett-Packard in 2015 and is now an independent company, headquartered in Chicago.N/A
Pricing
BookStackiManage Work
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BookStackiManage Work
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BookStackiManage Work
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
BookStackiManage Work
Small Businesses
Notion
Notion
Score 8.8 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Kofax Capture
Kofax Capture
Score 5.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BookStackiManage Work
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
BookStackiManage Work
Likelihood to Recommend
BookStack
BookStack is fantastic for having business users and not-so-technically-savvy IT users. It enables them to create a documentation they like in a visual way while still forcing them to adhere to logical structure of a document. It works fine even for more technical matters such as integration guidelines, especially when these concern some of the more obscure technologies. The exported docs are presentable but lack any interactivity. Where it lacks is generating heavily technical documentations. Heavier REST or GraphQL integrations should for example be documented through other means. As for developer documentations, there are definitely more suitable alternatives, also.
Read full review
iManage
Legal team using this product helps the team to better access documents securely within their email app (Outlook) and the user experience to control the document is excellent and being able to make it private and isolate confidential documents during a court session is very important and iManage has met our requirements. Also, being able to access instantly from users' workstation/laptop devices is very important and iManage plugin for outlook has satisfied our Business requirements.
Read full review
Pros
BookStack
  • Documentation
  • Guides
  • Knowledge-base
  • Version control
Read full review
iManage
  • The full text searching feature, once implemented properly, is incredibly powerful.
  • Integrates seamlessly with Outlook to reduce the number of pieces of software you need turning at any given time.
  • Filing is relatively quick most of the time.
Read full review
Cons
BookStack
  • Continuity in backward compatibility
  • Dark mode
  • Absent tree view
Read full review
iManage
  • Complicated setup. On initial installation it is cumbersome to configure on each workstation just to connect to service.
  • Does not enforce structure. Once setting up structure, users can save outside of iManage Work and make their own files and folders under pre-configured system.
  • Outlook is a finicky software, access to iManage Work depends on Outlook, nothing against iManage Work, but it sometimes has issues caused by the application it relies on.
Read full review
Support Rating
BookStack
No answers on this topic
iManage
We had an issue a few years ago where a plug-in of some sort which allowed the viewing of PDFs got updated and then whenever some people previewed PDFs in iManage then Outlook would crash. My outlook crashed over 20 times in a single day once. It was a pretty bad time. I know one of our information technology professionals in another office worked non-stop with iManage to get it resolved, and it seemed like they did take the issue pretty seriously.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BookStack
Confluence, having only a slight advantage in terms of features compared to BookStack, really only makes sense to procure as a part of the Jira bundle. It requires much more maintenance from my experience and does not really deliver any extra value aside from the very strict certifications like HIPAA. DokuWiki and MediaWiki both provided way too much in terms of customizability, not really focusing on the business need. Of course, MediaWiki was conceived for a whole different purpose but is very often seen being used for both internal and public documentation delivery. DokuWiki did not provide the authors with the user-friendly environment that BookStack has and integrated most poorly with LDAP. As for OneNote, which was used for support docs prior to BookStack, it provided the authors with too much of a user-friendly environment, rendering the product of their work very inconsistent. Also, the sharing model was either peer-to-peer or within Teams, neither of which made it easy to audit and supervise.
Read full review
iManage
I have viewed several other document management system software, but iManage was already installed at my company before I started working here. For us, I think this is the right solution. Companies with a smaller number of employees or smaller document collections could find some other options that might suite their needs and budget better. We definitely want an on premises solution that provides all the security, tracking, searching, and integration issues iManage offers. Many of the other solutions have adopted cloud technologies only at this point and we are not ready to consider cloud storage due for our sensitive documents at this point.
Read full review
Return on Investment
BookStack
  • Spillover within Business IT staff up, nearly double substitutability. This is through the ability of a support technician servicing a different product to find a guide describing how to solve the more frequent issues the way a product lead would do it.
  • Time to draft and publish a documentation down some 20% compared to previous solution.
  • OpenSource that integrates fine with enterprise-grade software and somehow even passes security audit. 20 times cheaper to implement compared to Confluence, almost free to maintain.
Read full review
iManage
  • A bit pricey but worth it once you know how to use it. It makes any document sharing easy and seamless which is priceless.
Read full review
ScreenShots