TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Score3.5 out of 10
    N/ACerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.N/A

    Epic

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AEpic offers a suite of medical practice management and EHR software.N/A
    Pricing
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    Chose Cerner HealtheIntent
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for …
    Incentivized
    Epic
    Chose Epic
    Epic has more features and seems to be used by most hospital systems, which means information can be shared between systems. It is not compatible with Cerner, McKesson, or any other of the less commonly used products and we cannot view information from such facilities. I …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Epic
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Epic
    8.3
    7 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
    Patient billing00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
    Financial Reporting00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Epic
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Epic
    7.9
    7 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Rule-based scheduling00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
    Automated appointment reminders00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Automated patient check-in00 Ratings7.25 Ratings
    Multi-location support00 Ratings8.66 Ratings
    Calendar interface00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Epic
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Epic
    8.6
    7 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Charting / document management00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Templates00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Patient portal00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
    Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings7.97 Ratings
    Fax integration00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
    Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings7.27 Ratings
    Workflow automation00 Ratings7.95 Ratings
    Speech recognition00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Customization00 Ratings7.67 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Epic
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Epic
    9.5
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    HIPAA compliance00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Role-based permission levels00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Workflow and Scale
    Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Epic
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Epic
    7.7
    7 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Task tracking00 Ratings6.97 Ratings
    Specialty-specific workflows00 Ratings6.97 Ratings
    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    eClinicalWorks
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cerner HealtheIntentEpic
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Epic
    Epic is very good on the medical side and continues improving mental health and dental care. Having integrated telehealth via Zoom was a game-changer. During COVID, it was vital to have telehealth options and to ensure it was completely HIPAA Compliant and easy to document inside their health record.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Epic
    • There are doctors' notes templates with prepopulated fields in them. This saves a lot of time.
    • Epic sends medication orders to pharmacies electronically so that we do not have to call. This saves a lot of time.
    • Epic has a Secure Chat feature via which we can send HIPAA protected messages to any employee with the patient's name and record attached.
    • It has a PDMP link. We can look up what controlled medications such as opiates patients have been prescribed and by whom.
    • It links to MyChart, which is a platform via which patients can look up their own information without them having to call the doctors. This saves a lot of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Epic
    • Visual Updates: While Epic is constantly improving the user experience, there are a few features that still need a design refresh. While this does not effect functionality, it does have an impact on user perception.
    • Ordering: While placing an order for a physician is very easy, a few changes to the workflow could improve the experience for physicians.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    It is beyond measure the best EHR on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    You should invest time into taking a training class before using Epic, but once you get the hang of it the usability features are endless! My favorite part about Epic is how it is automated and "trained" to catch user errors that would typically be missed in normal documentation/charting. This ensures accuracy and eliminates errors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    The initial training was good but would have been even better had I been more familiar with the system before taking it. I found learning how to deal with Epic while working in the field at the same time was a (pardon the pun) Epic learning curve. I really think there should be a scribe who does the data entry and others can focus on what they do best.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    Well-vetted lesson plans that teach you what you need to know for success.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    While not as effective as in-person training, it is still adequate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Epic
    Epic has a regimented implementation process that ensures a successful go-live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Epic
    Epic gives extensive customization options in terms of utility and view. I have found this to be highly useful and efficient EHR as compared to other EHRs we use in our organization.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Epic
    • Being able to track and document all of our services in the same place has made an exceptional improvement in continuity of patient care, both internally across departments (medical/dental/mental health) and externally with specialists and other healthcare organizations on a national scale.
    • Continuous improvements in Data reporting and analytics make tracking and implementing quality improvement measures throughout the year easy.
    • Massive improvements to the ELLA training platform, combined with detailed and interactive training materials for all system areas, make onboarding and staff training much easier!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots