Well, we've been using it for quite a number of years, so I guess I have evaluated, this is on the wireless side, the Ruckus platform, and it did not compare to the Cisco Meraki dashboard as far as the way it is utilized.
I dunno if I've used any other product like that. Honestly. Closest thing would be like Palo Alto, but they don't really because they have a little bit of a gooey and they do the firewall and that sort of thing and you can connect to Panorama and do modifications there. The …
Cisco Meraki MS switches are cheaper and the setup and configuration is much faster than traditional classic Cisco switches. Also the available free Dashboard offers easy access to monitoring and assurance services. Whereas with classic Cisco switches there is a need for …
Deutsche telekom is a Cisco partner; we work together and market Meraki customers to our customers. Solutions are tested and installed and deployed at the customer's premises based on requirements. depending on the customer's situation, a wide range of products are used. MR, …
Meraki Access points are also cloud managed and work hand in hand with Meraki MS. Since controller is cloud based, all the info is looked up on one portal. The portal is intutive and provides a lot of info. With the MS capable of stacking its even better
I think SD-Wan is not ature enough, and our company decided to use another vendor Integration could be useful, but there are many good things to be developed (link aggregation i.e.).
Meraki MS does not have the full feature set of Catalyst switches, however, the ease of deployment and implementation in less stringent environments makes them a great option
We have meraki access points with ISE radius integration for user authentication. Cisco MS is the right switch we can use it for the APs . It provides POE and easy troubleshooting tools especially when the AP is not physically reachable. Mearki AP deployment is very easy, we only …