CMiC Construction Platform vs. QAD Adaptive ERP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CMiC Construction Platform
Score 7.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…N/A
Pricing
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Features
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.9
30 Ratings
4% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.420 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history8.024 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration8.320 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.8.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting7.814 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)7.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
24 Ratings
6% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
1 Ratings
31% above category average
Pay calculation8.124 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors7.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.217 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.221 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management8.220 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management7.615 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.0
19 Ratings
3% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets7.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.9
56 Ratings
1% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
3 Ratings
31% above category average
Dashboards8.243 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Standard reports7.555 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Custom reports7.446 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Data exportability8.653 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.4
106 Ratings
2% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing7.467 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing6.863 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.081 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation7.077 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports7.388 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing7.289 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools8.190 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals8.595 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings7.054 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app8.264 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management7.985 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes7.251 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications7.139 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders8.360 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.6
56 Ratings
6% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools7.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.352 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases7.943 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator7.830 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation6.429 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
28% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 9.1 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Revit
Revit
Score 9.1 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(115 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(7 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(7 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.6
(96 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.9
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CMiC Construction PlatformQAD Adaptive ERP
Likelihood to Recommend
CMiC
CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
Read full review
QAD
If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
Read full review
Pros
CMiC
  • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
  • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
  • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
  • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
Read full review
QAD
  • The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
  • The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
  • The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
Read full review
Cons
CMiC
  • Needs to be more user friendly on the mobile side of the platform. Ease of use is key here.
  • There is not much instruction or support in standing up some programs like deploying ECM for outlook, making Collaboration Gateway work, or setting up the system for getting Plans available on the mobile devices.
  • Security configuration is extremely detailed and spread throughout the system. It is extremely hard to make adjustments to a person's security unless you know exactly where to look, which requires years of experience but shouldn't.
Read full review
QAD
  • Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
  • Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
  • Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CMiC
This is a platform that would continue to be in the best interest for our company. I just hope that CMiC support removes the gaps between the enhancements that they create to better the system to what they currently have
Read full review
QAD
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
Read full review
Usability
CMiC
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
Read full review
QAD
Easy to use, zero or minimum cost to maintain the database (DBA etc) , no issue with OS ( Linux), stable database
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
CMiC
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Performance
CMiC
Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CMiC
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
CMiC
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Online Training
CMiC
I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
CMiC
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CMiC
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Read full review
QAD
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
Read full review
Scalability
CMiC
CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
Read full review
QAD
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CMiC
  • Better project visibility, surely. I can step into a former project and see how well/poorly it was run.
  • Forecasting underway - nearly complete with year 2.
  • Cost status tracking - this has been valuable, especially when figuring out how much of a liquid budget is left over.
Read full review
QAD
  • It help us to reduce the inventories (FG and RAW)
  • It reduce the time to adjust to the constantly changing international customs laws
Read full review
ScreenShots

CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD