dbt vs. Integrate.io

If you can load your data first into your warehouse, dbt is excellent. It does the T(ransformation) part of ELT brilliantly but does not do the E(xtract) or L(oad) part. If you know SQL or your development team knows SQL, it's a framework and extension around that. So, it's easy to learn and easy to hire people with that technical skill (as opposed to specific Informatica, SnapLogic, etc. experience). dbt uses plain text files and integrates with GitHub. You can easily see the changes made between versions. In GUI-based UIs it was always hard to tell what someone had changed. Each "model" is essentially a "SELECT" statement. You never need to do a "CREATE TABLE" or "CREATE VIEW" - it's all done for you, leaving you to work on the business logic. Instead of saying "FROM specific_db.schema.table" you indicate "FROM ref('my_other_model')". It creates an internal dependency diagram you can view in a DAG. When you deploy, the dependencies work like magic in your various environments. They also have great documentation, an active slack community, training, and support. I like the enhancements they have been making and I believe they are headed in a good direction.

Incentivized

Integrate.IO or formerly XPlenty can be used for various needs:

• Multiple Sources (Excel, CSV, Text File, Blank File Type, All SQL Type)
• Multiple End Points (All SQL Type)
• Integration to Salesforce Sales Cloud
• Re-using the same package in different platforms which result to less development
• Value for the money

Incentivized

• user experience makes it easy to work with SQL and version control
• customer success team and the dbt (data build tool) community help establish best practices
• thorough and clear documentation

• Collecting data from different sources and making these available for BI tools or other IT systems.
• Their support department is really helpful when you are facing issues. Sometimes they refer to their documentation and sometimes they can help you right away.
• Generally I’m really happy with the ease of use. The software just does its job very well and we’re really getting a lot of value from it.

Incentivized

• Slow load times of the dbt cloud environment (they're working on it via a new UI though)
• More out-of-the-box solutions for managing procedures, functions, etc would be nice to have, but honestly, it's pretty easy to figure out how to adapt dbt macros

Incentivized

• It's not always easy to use.
• Debugging can be challenging when error logs lack specificity.
• Interaction between fields or packages is slow.

Incentivized

I found them super cool and helpful in any regarding to implementation.

Incentivized

Most ETL pipeline products have a T layer, but dbt just does it better. The transformation is on steroids compared to the others. Also, just allows much more Adhoc solutions for very specific projects. Those ETL tools are probably better on the T part if you don't need too many transforms - also dbt is pretty much free dependent on how you work it, also extremely scalable.

Incentivized

Integrate.io offers more customization options than Datorama, allowing businesses to create their own custom integrations and workflows using their API and SDKs. Integrate.io's pricing model is based on the number of data transactions, which may be more cost-effective for businesses that have a high volume of data.

Incentivized

• Simplified our BI layer for faster load times
• Increased the quality of data reaching our end users
• Makes complex transformations manageable

Incentivized

• Faster development with less skill requirements
• Part of long range planning
• Captured the data privacy requirements

Incentivized