Equips vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Equips
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Equips aims to change how people manage, maintain and protect critical equipment. Their cloud-based equipment management solution gives people one place and one process for all issues. Equips offers visibility to all equipment, across all locations and dispatch service providers, boasting that it takes as little as 15 seconds. Equips is presented as an ideal solution for businesses that utilize external service providers and technicians. Features…N/A
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Pricing
EquipsHippo CMMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EquipsHippo CMMS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
EquipsHippo CMMS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EquipsHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(1 ratings)
2.2
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
EquipsHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Equips
Equips is great to handle multiple units at different locations and maintain stats. As for managing 3rd party vendors, Equips still puts some of the responsibility on me to respond to 3rd party invoices. This was well Managed when I first stared with Equips over 3 years ago. As of lately, this seems to be slacking on a bigger scale. Almost every time I make a service call for our color copiers, I later receive an invoice from the vendor, and an invoice-reminder from the vendor. This is currently an ongoing issue which concerns me about adding any more units in the future.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Pros
Equips
  • Handles communication well.
  • Easy to use portal.
  • Quick response time.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
Cons
Equips
  • I still get invoices from the 3rd party vendor. Equips has inconsistent directions on how to handle this.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
Support Rating
Equips
No answers on this topic
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Equips
Equips is more affordable in comparison and we still get to use Ricoh through them.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Equips
  • We've saved money by switching to Equips.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Equips Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of