Freshsuccess vs. Planhat

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Freshsuccess
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Freshsuccess (based on technology acquired by Natero by Freshworks in May 2019) is designed to help Customer Success Managers prevent churn, increase account expansion, and manage more customers with less effort. The vendor says features include: Customer 360 - See customer emails, chats, meetings, support tickets, billing history, and product usage, in one place. Predictive Alerts - Predict which customers are likely to churn, convert, or expand their…
$79
per month per user
Planhat
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Planhat, headquartered in Stockholm, offers their modular suite of applications to subscription based businesses, providing customer success product usage health alerts and guidance, as well as revenue management for tracking subscriptions and business health.N/A
Pricing
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Editions & Modules
Estate
$79 billed annually
per month per user
Estate
$95 billed monthly
per month per user
Forest
$129 billed annually
per month per user
Forest
$150 billed monthly
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Considered Both Products
Freshsuccess
Chose Freshsuccess
Gainsight had all of the functionality but had the price tag to match. Churnzero and ClientSuccess were also very close, and we nearly chose one of those. We didn't love the UI of ChurnZero and ClientSuccess had the best UI by far but was lacking in some of the functionality …
Chose Freshsuccess
We initially looked at Gainsight, Amity, and another which I can't remember the name of. Only Natero and Amity were within a reasonable price range. We selected Natero because the platform was significantly more polished, the reporting seemed significantly stronger in Natero, …
Chose Freshsuccess
I highly recommend and prefer using Salesforce over Natero. Salesforce allows me to pull in as many fields into a report as I would like, compared to 14 different fields into Natero. I am able to view and make changes to information much quicker than Natero. I like Salesforce …
Chose Freshsuccess
I was not a part of the Natero selection group. In the past, I've used more project management focused tools that have much more detailed options for workflows, tasks and visualizations of those pieces. This is a large gap for me. Natero has an integration to pull from SFDC, …
Chose Freshsuccess
Natero is specifically built for customer success, other tools are merely capable of some of its functions. A tool like Pendo does a great job at aiding the product manager and helps to identify features and modules that are popular, but this doesn't translate into customer …
Chose Freshsuccess
Can't really say that, at the time I had natero I was evaluating [other] options.
Planhat
Chose Planhat
Overall performance is great in Planhat, and value vs investment (money) is good! Planhat is made for larger companies and teams that want to create a scalable way of working cross departments.
Chose Planhat
I have not used other CSM platforms but have trialed churn zero which had a much more user friendly interface, the cost was higher though
Chose Planhat
I believe Planhat is the best Customer Success Management tool in the market. It gives me a 360-degree view of all my customers and has a modern interface as compared to the other similar tools that I have used. Planhat also offers a competitive pricing that makes it easier for …
Chose Planhat
I was not the person involved in choosing Planhat, but it seems to me that Planhat is much better suited to an account management style role, whereas Hubspot is closer to a sales CRM instead. In my position, Planhat is better suited as it is more graphical, more flexible, and …
Chose Planhat
When evaluating Planhat, we found that it had a better UI and was a more rounded product than Churn Zero. Planhat was considerably more expensive than Churn Zero, but we felt that the extra investment was worthwhile given that the product better met our needs.

Chose Planhat
Planhat compares relatively well to Totango, despite not coming along with the massive price tag. It was able to perform all of the functions our CSM team was needing and hoping it could do for us. It was able to highlight the customer's health according to the metrics we …
Chose Planhat
Planhat was better value for money, seemed to be more user-friendly, and required less time to set up.
Chose Planhat
We needed a software that would not take months to set up and learn how to use. We needed powerful data that was easy to understand and action based on health scores dropping, etc. It was also important for us to be able to get our full team on the platform so that we could all …
Chose Planhat
Planhat was the most agile and easy to use software, while still having unique and powerful features that allowed us to really customize the software around our organization and needs. Planhat is more than a Customer Success tool in essence and adds tremendous value and …
Chose Planhat
Planhat has a better UI, covers a wide range of features and use-cases. It covers hybrid tech-touch and high touch well. Strong on revenue management.
Chose Planhat
Planhat won on best UI, easy to use, easy to set up and had the enterprise-grade features we were looking for.
Features
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Planhat
7.6
Ratings
11% below category average
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.1
Ratings
20% below category average
Planhat
7.7
Ratings
12% below category average
API7.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com7.20 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Integration with Marketo7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Eloqua7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Data Extraction / Integration
Comparison of Customer Data Extraction / Integration features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
8.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Planhat
8.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Product usage8.10 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Help desk / support tickets9.10 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customer Success Management
Comparison of Customer Success Management features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.1
Ratings
19% below category average
Planhat
8.0
Ratings
7% below category average
NPS surveys7.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Sponsor tracking7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer profiles7.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflow8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Internal collaboration5.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Customer health scoring8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer segmentation7.20 Ratings7.90 Ratings
CSM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CSM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.4
Ratings
13% below category average
Planhat
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Customer health trends9.10 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Engagement analytics7.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Revenue forecasting4.40 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Dashboards9.10 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Small Businesses
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 7.8 out of 10
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Gainsight CS
Gainsight CS
Score 8.8 out of 10
Gainsight CS
Gainsight CS
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FreshsuccessPlanhat
Likelihood to Recommend
  • Natero does an excellent job of reporting and having a lot of the data available. They don't do as well when you want to track specific metrics such as ARR. (Everything in the application is currently based in MRR)
  • Natero has done an excellent job for our smaller organization. I am not sure how it would work with a larger organization.
Read full review
Planhat is very cost-effective compared to its competitors and offers a similar level of functionality. So if you are looking for a CS platform that will give your CSM's all the data they need to manage their portfolio, then Planhat will do the job very well. I was part of the team that was tasked with selecting a CS platform for Pexip, and the combination of cost and performance made Planhat a clear winner against the other two products we were evaluating.
I still use Salesforce on a daily basis because that's the platform we use to generate quotes. It would be nice if I only had one platform to perform all of my CS tasks in. I'm not sure if that's a criticism of Planhat or not, as I don't know if it has a quoting module that we haven't implemented, or whether that function simply isn't available.
Read full review
Pros
  • Love the accounts view to see all my accounts, their health and some helpful stats!
  • The charting is relevant and detailed for customers to understand their usage of our product. The look and feel is very clean and easy to understand.
  • In the account, you can link to other documentation, which is great!
Read full review
  • Excellent customer support and onboarding experience. They are very quick to respond to queries via the live chat. Our CS manager was brilliant in helping us get set up and making sure we were getting the most from all the features.
  • The platform and features are very user friendly and intuitive. It's an extremely powerful tool with a lot of functionality, but thankfully it doesn't take long to learn how to use it.
  • The customer portal is a game changer. The ability to share playbooks, data, and meeting notes all in one place is so useful for our customers and helps build trust and transparency.
Read full review
Cons
  • It's a complex platform, it can be hard to find what you're looking for if you don't know where to look.
  • There have been a few features which work correctly but can be a bit confusing to get working correctly. Fortunately, the support team is so on it, we get an answer within an hour.
  • I would have liked Natero to have a mechanism in place to nudge users of the platform to use it. This would help with getting adoption on our end. While the onboarding documentation was great, a more hands-on approach to getting users to adopt and use the platform would have helped us get up to speed earlier. It took us nearly 9 months to really start using the system which is partially due to the complexity of the integration process and partially due to the difficulty of switching over CES processes into Natero.
Read full review
  • Allow for cc'ing of AEs or others within the same organization from the messaging center. When I went to send a message from within Planhat, I had to manually type out the AE's email address every time if I wanted them cc'd.
  • The fonts were funky if I went to add text into an existing email template. For example, if I added in an extra sentence or paragraph, in Outlook on the recipient's end, the font was different despite looking the same within Planhat. Gmail was all consistent, Outlook was showing a different font.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It takes a while to learn Planhat even for experienced users. It has limitations in terms of what data you can present where, but its important to set internal guides outside Planhat as well so everybody working collaborative. But as CSM Planhat is a great- and critical tool which I use daily to optimise my work schedule and customer interaction with various topics.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Planhat support is excellent. We have a dedicated resource allocated to work with us, and he is extremely knowledgeable, articulate and responsive. The wider support team at Planhat is also very good, responding quickly to any issues logged. As an end-user, you can chat with Planhat support if you encounter any issues or have any questions, and they have always helped me.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We initially looked at Gainsight, Amity, and another which I can't remember the name of. Only Natero and Amity were within a reasonable price range. We selected Natero because the platform was significantly more polished, the reporting seemed significantly stronger in Natero, and during the sales process Natero did a better job of showing us how the functionality would work, whereas our calls with Amity were frequently filled with "it doesn't work because this is a demo account" which was a bit of a red flag.
Read full review
I believe Planhat is the best Customer Success Management tool in the market. It gives me a 360-degree view of all my customers and has a modern interface as compared to the other similar tools that I have used. Planhat also offers a competitive pricing that makes it easier for my team to evaluate as compared to other similar platforms. The support team of Planhat is also great which makes it the right fit for my organisation
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's made my job harder.
  • It's made it harder to update my customer's information.
  • It's made me spend more time deleting information to satisfy the character limit.
Read full review
  • Planhat has, for the first time, given us a 360-degree view of all our customers and access to all the different types of communication we have with them across different departments and functions.
  • The ability to automate workflows, tasks, and assign playbooks to the various phases of our customer lifecycle has aligned all our departments.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Freshsuccess Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Planhat Screenshots

Screenshot of Insights identify outliers in a portfolio to help users understand risks and opportunities.Screenshot of Displays clients through any filter to shows only the information that matters.