Frontline Recruiting & Hiring vs. Brassring

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Score 7.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Frontline Recruiting & Hiring (formerly called AppliTrack) is recruiting, hiring and onboarding software for K-12 school districts from Frontline Technologies. It includes a set of online tools that help users attract more qualified candidates, as well as custom automated workflows that streamline hiring and onboarding communications. It also includes credentials tracking and compliance reporting.N/A
Brassring
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.N/A
Pricing
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Considered Both Products
Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
We use Paylocity as our HRIS system and they offer an applitrack/recruiting function. However, we were using Frontline Recruiting & Hiring platform prior to Paylocity. We new Paylocity did not have the universal application process and Frontline Recruiting. We also used in …
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Skyward HRMS and PowerSchool eSchoolPLUS
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
I think they are somewhat similar but Frontline is easier to navigate.
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Our HR department went with [Frontline Recruiting & Hiring] w/o investigating other solutions. It was an easy choice since we were already working with Frontline for Substitute Management & Educational Training. Still would have been nice to see what other options were …
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
I truly think Frontline Recruiting & Hiring is one of the higher up and more useful websites to manage all your hiring needs. It allows for simplified, and fast-tracked hiring processes and helps increase efficiency. I also think that although the design and layout is not …
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Before we just used individual job sites, such as monster. Frontline makes life easier for us.
Chose Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
Frontline by far had the most user-friendly features, some others could do as many or close to as many things but they were not as user-friendly.
Brassring
Chose Brassring
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) …
Chose Brassring
It stacks up well against Bullhorn CRM for candidate retrieval but not as streamlined or automated.
Chose Brassring
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated.
Chose Brassring
We recently started using Assess for our Food Service and Area Managers and the results have not been as accurate as Kenexa. We have since made some bad hires off the results of Assess, we have had one particular Area Manager that scored in the "Best" category and her behavior …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa fares very poorly in practice against almost anything else. It checks the boxes of raw functionality, and offers wide customization. However, in practice it is a nightmare to use for almost everything. I was not part of the initial implementation, so I am not aware of …
Chose Brassring
Kenekxa removes the CV's after 90 days even when the recruitment process for the position is still in progress so you basically have have a situations where the CV put up by a consultant is automatically removed without any information to Client or Consultant and that candidate …
Chose Brassring
I did not have much to do with the selection process, but I found out that OpenHire was in the running, which is the worst system I have ever worked with. I was able to share my OpenHire experience, and hopefully that assisted with the selection of Kenexa. Compared to other …
Chose Brassring
We used Kenexa due to its price. But the ultimate thing that we learned in the end is that: you get what you pay for.
It wasn't so awful that we wanted to just do physical recruiting, but then again it wasn't good enough to where we were happy with our results.
Bullhorn is …
Chose Brassring
Kenexa allowed for the requisition process to automated where as Ceridian's version I worked on did not. Also the Kenexa version allows multiple copies of an applications where the Ceridian version I previously used did not and made affirmative action harder to comply with.
Chose Brassring
I have used PeopleSoft eRecruit which was horrible and didn't give the recruiters the ability to source for candidates inside the system. We just implemented Workday Recruit in the last month and it has many functionality deficincies right now but it is a new product and they …
Chose Brassring
JobDiva, Maxhire. Kenexa is a much cleaner interface than the other two - appears to be a standard system across organizations.
Chose Brassring
I didn't! However, I have used both SmartSearch and SilkRoad OpenHire extensively. SmartSearch is fantastic for recruiter geeks who really want to find out all the neat things that are available. It's fast, super easy to use, and quite elegant in design. Probably not a good …
Features
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Frontline Recruiting & Hiring
7.2
Ratings
10% below category average
Brassring
7.5
Ratings
5% below category average
Job Requisition Management9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Company Website Posting8.70 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Publish to Social Media3.40 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting5.10 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Customized Application Form4.60 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Resume Management8.90 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.60 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Candidate Search4.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Applicant Tracking9.00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Collaboration8.70 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Email Templates7.30 Ratings7.70 Ratings
User Permissions9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Reporting5.40 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
1.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Frontline Recruiting & HiringBrassring
Likelihood to Recommend
Frontline Recruiting & Hiring is well suited for the educational industry. Time is valuable and requiring candidates to apply at each employer of choice takes time and can be a bit frustrating. Many schools in Delaware and Pennsylvania use Frontline Recruiting & Hiring. An employer who uses Frontline Recruiting & Hiring makes it easier on the application process because the applicant only has to complete the application once. All you have to do is create one login and password, then they're able to use the same application to apply to any multiple different employers, as long as they use Frontline Recruiting & Hiring. I love this feature.
Read full review
Other products in the same category as Kenexa 2x BrassRing would be Taleo and PeopleFluent. I would also look into Avature as an ATS option. I am currently on the sourcing side of the recruitment process and use Avature for tracking and candidate mining purposes. I would recommend getting any kind of demo possible since the user interfaces vary quite a bit between them. Ease of use and overall stability should be kept in mind when comparing ATS prices.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to read, well organized.
  • Passes info on to other programs in frontline's suite.
  • Dashboard shows how many jobs are open, filled and other important data.
Read full review
  • Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
  • Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
  • Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
Read full review
Cons
  • interface isn't friendly - isn't modern or current
  • looks clunky for what it is
  • its an expensive product platform
  • customer service isn't quick to respond
Read full review
  • Setting up integrations is extremely tedious. For instance, setting up an address feed would have required sending over 5 different spreadsheets on a daily basis (one each for every facility name, street address, zip code, state, country) and a 6th sheet to make the connection between the other 5 elements. We opted not to set up that integration as a result.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is an excellent product for hiring and for the applicants.
Read full review
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Read full review
Usability
While any and all platforms have room to grow and evolve. Frontline Recruiting & Hiring overall meets my expectations. There is still some room to grow in its functionality but they have a clear purpose for this platform, which they meet. As I mentioned previously, generationally applicants do not want to complete a lengthy application process. Frontline Recruiting & Hiring eliminates this when other employers use the same platform.
Read full review
There is nothing that a recruiter needs to do that they can't do with Kenexa 2XB but the proprietary, old fashioned UI is far from intuitive to use. I only rate 2XB this highly because the SaaS is up most of the time, performance is usually reasonable, and it does actually work.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Just slow for what we are doing here
Read full review
Support Rating
They are very helpful if necessary, but honestly, a lot of the page is easily managed on your own. This means that you do not have to spend a long time working with customer support, because you don't need it! The simplified process helps cut down on issues and makes it easily accessible and useful to any and all
Read full review
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We purchased an out of the box solution and that worked well for us.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Our HR department went with [Frontline Recruiting & Hiring] w/o investigating other solutions. It was an easy choice since we were already working with Frontline for Substitute Management & Educational Training. Still would have been nice to see what other options were available.
Read full review
The primary reason of still going with Kenexa is because we have been using it for quite some time now. And considering it is used by more than 30 countries, it makes the training and communication about Kenexa easy. Also purchasing this license for a longer period (3, 5 years) makes it very cost effective as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I think it simplifies the process, leading to a return on investment.
  • It helps you find the best candidate for the position which also is a huge ROI because you are getting your money's worth.
  • It allows for a fast process, which means you spend less of your valuable time trying to find a candidate.
Read full review
  • Kenexa has assisted us in identifying top talent within our target market of applicants.
  • Kenexa may exclude potentially good associates that don't test well.
  • Kenexa clearly defines specific categories and general notes for training, development, & coaching of associates on areas of opportunity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Frontline Recruiting & Hiring Screenshots

Screenshot of