Indeed Recruiter Extension vs. Linkedin Recruiter

I would not recommend it to anyone. In my experience, it rarely works if at all.

Incentivized

I can manage candidates from the search to moving them to projects to messaging in one place, which makes it a more streamlined and efficient process. If a candidate does not respond to an outreach message from my LinkedIn recruiter mailbox, I can then send a connection request and a message directing them, to the recruiter message.

Incentivized

• The scheduler is my most favorite part of Recruiter. Super easy and organized to use.
• It also can integrate with my applicant tracking system when and if I hire from LinkedIn Recruiter.
• The fact that you can see an applicants full profile gives more information than just a resume when selecting candidates to interview.

Incentivized

• In my opinion, Everything
• In my experience, it is not working more than it is working
• In my experience, has many technical problems

Incentivized

• For some reason, whenever I click "View in Recruiter" it takes me to the project summary screen instead of that candidate's profile in Recruiter
• It would be nice if candidates got automatically moved to the appropriate stage when an action is taken (ie "Contacted" after sending them a message)

Incentivized

We will not be renewing

Incentivized

In my experience, it is almost never on line

Incentivized

LinkedIn Recruiter has the largest reach globally. I mean, if you're not on LinkedIn, do you even exist? ;) It is the only real game in town for one-stop-shopping for candidates. The service is premium, and so is the price. However, there is nothing that I'm aware of in the market that can compete.

Incentivized

• Refined search for the appropriate candidates.
• Emails sent are not sure to be delivered as there is no notifications.
• Not worth the amount spent in getting the service.
• Contact information unavailable to get in touch.
• Limits in the daily use of InMail.

Incentivized