MessageBird vs. Respond.io

MessageBird seems to me a very useful tool for the times we are living [in] and the paradigm shift in corporate communications in all industries. It is very good at exchanging information and plain text. It works with some difficulty for sending images and other functionalities that the real WhatsApp application has, but the client on the other side does not know about this and sometimes sends information such as location that it is not possible to obtain.

Incentivized

If you're looking to implement the WhatsApp business api for your official number in your product Respond.io is the solution to go because the truth is that there is no easy way and most of the providers will assume that you have developers in order to create your own implementation and many of the other solutions our there are not even close to Respond.io and they are usually expensive. Also, most of the Customer Service software out there will offer you the typical channel but will skip Whatsapp while Respond.io does the opposite (check it out for the free tier if you're not convinced).

Incentivized

• SMS delivery
• Webhooks for delivery reports
• SMS pricing

Incentivized

• Easy integration with WhatsApp business api, you just need a verified number
• The CRM for WhatsApp is easy to use very friendly and let you make follow-ups to your users
• They finally implemented the broadcast option where you can schedule broadcast messages to a specific list of users.

Incentivized

• It does not accept all the functions of whatsapp
• It has no integration with the Pipedrive CRM
• Sometimes it doesn't work in real time, leaving clients waiting in an invisible "queue"

Incentivized

• You have to be patient with Respond.io since many features are still in development I wish they can make features faster
• In order to use WhatsApp business api you need a number that is provided by Twilio they also have implemented other number providers but it will be nice that they add more WhatsApp business number providers (since we have a US number instead of a Mexican number)

Incentivized

Twilio prices were much higher for our initial volume (30k SMS/month). But they have more APIs and more services if you need to integrate email, SMS, and other channels. We didn't need those features, only basic SMS and email, so we kept each feature from one provider. Email from Sendgrid and SMS from MessageBird

Incentivized

When we were implementing WhatsApp business api number in Bussi. We had 2 options the first Zendesk smooch.io and the second one a Twilio WhatsApp number. In the beginning, it seemed that Zendesk smooch.io was the option to go but the conversation was quite slow also the integration was easy but you needed to manage this conversation from zendesk which we were not completely sure about since it's more like a ticketing platform. Fortunately, we were looking and testing solutions until we found Respond.io, and even if they didn't have at the time the broadcast feature they let us know that feature was already in development so we felt that they were building a solution we were looking for so we decided to give them a few months and in those few months they built this feature and is a more dynamic way to answer customers than tickets so we decided to go with them.

Incentivized

• Quick contact with collection clients
• Delivers the feeling of instantaneous
• It is good to start the relationship, but continue it through the call center.

Incentivized

• Most options we saw before Respond.io needed a minimum number of messages, contracts, or costly integrations from the side of the vendor while Respond.io is actually helping you to integrate the product with no extra cost.
• Our users choose the communication channel they want so before we were losing leads and money because we were not able to attend this channel.
• It requires a $0 investment to implement or maintain from the side of the developer area so we use our technical resources to develop our main core product not a WhatsApp chat integration feature.

Incentivized