Preseem vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Preseem
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Preseem is an Edge Network Quality of Experience (QoE) solution designed to help wireless internet service providers (WISPs) measure, analyze and improve the experience of subscribers on their network. The vendor states WISPs can save time and expense with Preseem's automated plan enforcement, clear metrics and insights, and integrations with various billing systems. By using advanced traffic shaping techniques, Preseem helps users optimize subscriber QoE and network ROI, decrease churn,…
$200
per month
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
SignalFX is Real-Time Cloud Monitoring and Observability for Infrastructure, Microservices and Applications. SignalFX was acquired by Splunk in August 2019. SignalFX Infrastructure Monitoring provides real-time cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure, microservices and DevOps. A new SignalFX product, SignalFx Microservices APM, was released March 2020 to detect issues, provide real-time app troubleshooting, and future-proof expectations.
$15
per month
Pricing
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPreseem pricing is based on a per subscriber per month basis. Prices start at $0.60 per subscriber per month, with volume discounts available. The minimum monthly subscription is $200.
More Pricing Information
Features
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Network Performance Monitoring
Comparison of Network Performance Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Preseem
8.6
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring
-
Ratings
Network monitoring9.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Baseline threshold calculation9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Network capacity planning9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Packet capture analysis6.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Network mapping8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Wireless infrastructure monitoring8.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PingPlotter
PingPlotter
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Nmap
Nmap
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(6 ratings)
8.4
(24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
PreseemSplunk Infrastructure Monitoring
Likelihood to Recommend
Preseem
For any ISP that wants to know the QoE their customers experience while using their service, Preseem is an excellent choice. The rate plan shaping also makes sure the connection feels fast, even if the speeds are being 100% utilized by the customer. This is not a DPI service though, so you can't classify or shape certain services over others. All traffic is treated fairly, and small flows are moved to the front of the queue to make sure interactive traffic like VOIP, DNS, and gaming is working well ahead of large downloads.
Read full review
Splunk
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
Read full review
Pros
Preseem
  • Graphical real time data of condition of our network.
  • Real-time data of network performance, network-wide, tower site-wide, sector-wide, and down to the subscriber level. Data that is both current and historical so we can see trends happening before a service-impacting issue arises.
  • The comparison of our network equipment performance compared to identical equipment that others have deployed throughout their entire customer base.
Read full review
Splunk
  • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
  • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
  • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
  • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
Read full review
Cons
Preseem
  • The tool could stand to be a little less engineered, but really the ROI isn't there for them to do so. I don't think most of us care about how pretty it looks, more so does it work and can I figure it out in relatively short order.
Read full review
Splunk
  • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
  • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
  • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
  • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Preseem
No answers on this topic
Splunk
Good: Stable system with low error rate Easy to use for simple use cases Bad: UI is not very clear for complex usage Mobile view (when logged in from phone) is bad No library for .net
Read full review
Usability
Preseem
No answers on this topic
Splunk
I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay. Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Preseem
Any Amplifi product can show client infrastructure usage and date. the Dream Machine is perfect because it has built-in everything for the client to manage his local network.
Read full review
Splunk
They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Preseem
  • Best money we have ever spent on technology
  • Night and day difference in application performance after Preseem was implemented.
  • Key tool for customer satisfaction.
Read full review
Splunk
  • Reduced downtime.
  • Caused us to get a lot of spam when we redeployed apps and old instances stopped sending metrics. Muting alerts solves this, but people often forget to do it or do it incorrectly.
  • Helped us find historical info about instances/apps.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Preseem Screenshots

Screenshot of Preseem Subscriber SummaryScreenshot of Preseem Wireless SummaryScreenshot of Preseem Metrics Explorer

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-time monitoring for public, private and hybrid cloud