The biggest thing about RHEL that makes it stand out for enterprise users is the support that we get from the vendor. Whereas with the other ones, you're basically left on your own. There's no official repo, there's no satellite for patching. You're very left on your own with …
RHEL is better for most use cases that I use professionally for sure. It's the best choice for a professional development environment or a professional server environment.
They have their own pluses and minuses, but for what RHEL eight is and for what it does, I would recommend it above anything else for an enterprise. Two, consistency and stability of the environment, making sure the packages that our developers need are available and not being …
We have been using AAP wherever possible to streamline RHEL deployments, which includes the on-prem bare metal and VM systems, as well as cloud based applications that require traditional compute interfaces. AAP is used for the on-perm infrastructure deployment and …
None of them provide the consistency and forward looking support that Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is better suited to every environment.
We have tried other vendors but we don't have a strong support team, so Red Hat can help with this stuff. Also we use RHEL because it gives us security when setting up our services. We try to standardize our DC and work as much as possible with RHEL due to its ease of use, its …
We selected RHEL because it is a supported platform from our ISVs, because of the Enterprise-level support, and because of the long history of Open Source involved and community contributions.