PyCharmPricing

Pricing is a bit high compared to alternatives, but I am happy to pay for a good

quality enhance collaboration and reduce training code Negatives : licensing cost

pretty slow on older hardware Feature-dense - hard to know how to unlock value immediately, big learning curve Somewhat confusing git integration - merging

little slow to startup It's expensive for amateur work, so if you are a freelancer DevOp this probably won't be affordable

It's value for money because of its cheap . Just <$200 per user

Its great and huge feature set comes at the cost of space, complexity and speed. … fewer man hours. Convenient deployment: fewer man hours and maintenance cost.

It is not lightweight Expensive Rendering the notebook is frustrating

Heavy on machine resources. Ultimate license is not cheap.

Slightly bulky. Pro version is tad expensive. … Less expensive, better customer support.

functions. At least I didn't find this description. The value of the full version is very expensive, thinking about the location I am in. These new versions

Pricing is too high. In the community edition lack of framework support.

It has a complex interface. Virtual environment management. Pricing.

projects like auto-indentation for Python code. Its paid version is a bit cheaper than IntelliJ. PyCharm offers integration of fancy things like Jupyter notebook

applications is well-designed: it is simple to follow changes in variable values and to evaluate expressions. Subjective: the application is quite stylish

PyCharm is the perfect general Python development environment. It's value becomes apparent once your codebase reaches a certain size. It has excellent

Pycharm is expensive if you cannot get a license through work (although you can get a lightweight … who want an IDE with many options. Since the full version of Pycharm is expensive, I personally do not think it would be worth spending my own money on Pycharm &h…