TestComplete

TestComplete is the key UI automation tool in our organization. It allows us to quickly and efficiently write powerful, fast, scalable and reliable automated tests. It is a key driver in allowing us to react to customer needs, and quickly implement change in our products, while giving us the confidence to know our products still meet the levels of quality our users expect.

TestComplete is being used to perform software quality assurance checks by IT professionals located on a respective scrum team. The software is currently being used for various core systems and business applications across a variety of technologies enterprise wide. The business problem that it addresses is ensuring code quality that supports a positive the end user experience and stability.

TestComplete is being used in our organization by our QA team to support our custom in-house applications as well as our externally facing web site applications. TestComplete has allowed us to push more reliable code out more quickly giving us the confidence that the development team hasn't broken other areas of our applications. We previously were pushing out changes without knowing that other areas broke since we didn't have the time to manually test everything.

TestComplete can be used fully to automate all desktop, web, and mobile apps across different teams or organizations. Most of the ROI reduces a lot of scripting and time, in order to solve errors and warnings since TestComplete supports AI driven self-healing mechanisms. It also integrates with all the CI/CD tools/bug tracking tools easily.
It has increased speed by delivery (record/playback, reusability of scripts), automation made simpler(manual testers/anybody can use it with no skillset), and delivery of the quality customers want (AI features helps you correct and detect potential issues).

We have 150 different applications that we test using different tools. TestComplete is one of the tools that we are using prominently to test our many applications.

TestComplete is mainly used across our all departments and I would say people are widely using that.

It removes the complexity of using difficult tools like Selenium and no prior programming language knowledge is needed to create or run these tests. We are automating our sanity and regression test suites using Test Complete.

TestComplete is used within my company in special projects. We use it to automate the regression tests for a product we develop for our customers.

We're primarily using TestComplete to run UI tests against a web application and standalone applications. The web application is older and has a lot of architecture that is outdated and limits us from running automated tests that are based more in the API/integration-based area. That means we are stuck with running more UI-based tests than a true test automation group might like to have. TestComplete makes organizing and running our tests fairly smooth.

It is used by a few divisions in our company for automated testing. Mainly for Windows or Java, Desktop feature. We also use TestExecute. It saves a lot of time by automated actions instead of constantly doing manual work by developers. Maintenance of the code is also simpler. It will help your workers, it helps you!

TestComplete is being used in our QA department. We use it to run our regression when receiving a new release from out vendor. This is useful as we usually complete around 500 test case[s] per release. As we get new releases monthly, we are able to run TestComplete and quickly and easily see if any part[s] of the program have broken.

Currently only the QA department uses TestComplete and mainly as a regression tool. Recently though Development Head also start using this as part of a system overhaul, again using it as a regression and sanity check tool. TestComplete will assist any "reader" of the test case to see the process flow and of course, any errors caused by the recent deployment of code will be flagged.

TestComplete is used solely within the Quality department at my organization and is used to test the web application portion of our product. We maintain a bank of test scripts that we developed, and are planning to integrate the execution of the test scripts into our CI/CD pipeline in the near future.

TestComplete is being used across the organization for multiple purposes. The QA Team uses it for their functional and regression testing, and the same is being used to test the integration by the Devs. The BAs and other businesses use it to get the UAT. Before, we put our applications into the production environment.

We used TestComplete for automation testing on our web application regression testing daily. We use it for our department application. Mostly we use it as a daily regression test to test each main function of the application [for] most UI functions.

I started using TestComplete about 7 years ago when I was brought into the company to set up a formal software QA process. I had used a few other automation tools in the past but wanted to try a bunch out on the new software. I ended up going with SmartBear as it worked well with the software I was going to test. With TestComplete's modules, I was able to use web and mobile scripts easily. Our sales tools have complex formulas to get pricing, so TestComplete made it easy to do. I pull rates from the DB, use an Excel spreadsheet to store options/data for each scenario to run, calculate the values, then easily compare to what is shown on the screen to verify. Android app was just as easy to use.

For the second set of automation, I created data entry scripts that allow TestComplete to enter business data into our main system 24/7 with the desktop module. This ensures that there's no human error entering and it saves from having a team input data for days on end. Adding TestExecute to a virtual machine means that I can push my TC code there and have any number of users run the data entry scripts at anytime. By adding code to allow the user to pick their Excel sheet of data and which line to start on, I don't ever need to babysit the execution of the automation or make changes to the code on the fly.

This is saving the company time and money that can be invested back into the departments for other things. I have a single development TestComplete license for myself and have numerous TestExecute licenses for anyone to use. The license manager sits on a physical machine that they have access to pull from.

We use TestComplete for regression testing [our] ERP system.

TestComplete is only used by the IT QA department. I use it to automate testing, which increases the amount of tests that are completed in a short period of time.

We use TestComplete in the Quality Assurance department, especially me, as we have a one-seat license to Test our records Management Software. We use TestComplete to do functional testing of our product. It helps during our release cycle to run smoothly and helps us to minimize the manual workload.

TestComplete is our primary automation tool for regression testing

We use it as a test automation tool for UI regression testing. It provides good test coverage and provides unique solutions to most of our automation challenges (e.g. comparison of images).

My organization uses TestComplete to automate testing of our custom software. The software is a windows application, used with a medical device that we are designing. The software and test engineers use this program at my organization. TestComplete automates testing which allows for quicker and more thorough software validation. This helps us to iterate quicker on software releases.

TestComplete is used by several teams in my organization but not all. It is typically used for test automation and mainly for functional and regression testing.

TestComplete has been used to automate desktop applications across various departments in our organization. It helps to automate legacy desktop GUI applications which helps us to reduce test cycle time from 3 weeks to 4 days by automating 75% of test cases. Hence overall release cycle time has been reduced.

I am a lead on the Automation Team. TestComplete is used among my organization for various products. We build upon what TestComplete offers us as our core with our code application-specific frameworks and scripts for sanity, smoke, and regression testing. QA are trained against the TestComplete tool, the FWK and coding to learn how to script, execute, debug, and analyze the results. TestComplete helps greatly to catch defects, DEV changes, design flaws, and performance before releasing to our clients. These issues can only be caught if the scripts are coded in a smart fashion and TestComplete helps with the functionality it provides.

TestComplete is used in our test automation process. With continued integration, our automated tests developer, using TestComplete, will perform sanity tests/smoke test that will test the application included in the build every time our developer submits their code changes. It is also used in our day to day/regression testing when we have a scheduled release.

The development team and I noticed we spent a lot of time manually testing everything in our product before it went out the door. Specifically, the sanity test that we conduct before we release a new version.

It was decided that we needed to automate this long and costly procedure. So, I spent some time looking for options and TestComplete seemed like the perfect solution.