Heaps of features straight out of the box; a great little tool!
August 11, 2017
Heaps of features straight out of the box; a great little tool!
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Watson Campaign Automation
We use IBM Watson Campaign Automation (WCA) ourselves as well as for reselling and offering implementation and best practice consultancy. It offers comprehensive integration options to CRM solutions such as Sugar and Salesforce, both with native integration and via a comprehensive suite of APIs, allowing us to automate and have an easy vision of our own marketing and lead generation activities.
Pros
- Very easy to learn with extensive on-demand, self-paced e-Learning, a knowledge base to query other users' learnings and responsive 24/7 support via a portal.
- Intuitive interface; work from left to right to join up data (contacts), email creative, campaign automation, reporting and integrated products.
- Great automation capability: set up and automate the easy stuff quickly, allowing you to pay more attention to the hard stuff.
- Easily import and personalise your HTML in the WYSIWYG editor, simple A/B/C/D testing process with automated execution to the winner and capacity for complex personalisation and dynamic emails creation.
Cons
- My clients are crying out for a drag and drop email editor. While the WYSIWYG editor is fine, this would be a huge win for IBM!
- The inbuilt reporting suite could do with an overhaul and to allow users to build more customised reports. Some elements of the reporting could do with better filtering options as well, or start with a filter rather than loading everything in the first instance.
- Would be good to be able to make more assets portable between databases and have an 'asset import mapping' process to re-point/configure anything that doesn't match the original source.
- You get a lot of features out of the box as standard.
- What you can't get do of the box, you can either purchase as an add-on or execute via some API development.
- Automating simple campaigns easily frees up more time to work on more complex work.
I've used IBM Campaign and Apteco PeopleStage and find WCA significantly easier to get to grips with. Simplicity comes from the presentation of the data to the tool and an intuitive UI. IBM Campaign has significantly greater ease of access to and manipulation of ad hoc data sources, but that ease can lead to excessive/unecessary data being drawn in and laziness around preparation.
Acoustic Campaign Feature Ratings
Using IBM Watson Campaign Automation
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- The UI is very intuitive
- HTML can be easily imported and personalised in the WYSIWYG editor
- Great multi-channel automation capabilities
- Few minor flaws like switching between HTML and Design view in WYSIWYG editor have been around for a while and need fixing.
- Sometimes when a program (campaign automation) is particularly lengthy and complicated it can be difficult to figure out what is happening. Also there is no save function, so make a mistake and you may have to spend a while putting it back together again!
- Reporting needs modernising and introduction of greater customisation capablities.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation