ABBYY FineReader vs. OpenText eDOCS

It works exceptionally well for digitizing paper and scanned documents for storage and simple retrieval mainly thanks to OCR technology, which greatly simplifies the process. If there is a need for protection and/or signing scanned documents than ABBYY FineReader has all the necessary features implemented. It may not be the best choice for individuals, where advanced functionalities are not really needed.

Incentivized

My team and I have benefited positively from the work of this platform. Our content and any data that is created during the project implementation process are securely stored in a safe storage space. Documents are arranged well to enhance faster identification during the time of reference. It provides cloud-based based backup support to minimize file losses. It is best suited to the electronic data management suite.

Incentivized

• Read and analyze complicated documents
• Automatically recognize tables and charts
• Convert any documents into various common formats

Incentivized

• Secure.
• Accessibility.
• User experience.
• Ease of use.
• One stop solution for all types of file/data storage.
• Can be accessed via mobile, tablet, laptops.

Incentivized

• Conversion to MS Word (formatting accuracy issues occur)
• Conversion to MS Excel (formatting accuracy issues occur)

Incentivized

• Their learning services could improve
• The cloud management isn't the best in the market

Incentivized

Although both have functionalities that they share, in ABBYY FineReader they are better implemented, they have a better performance, in addition to being a more intuitive and simple user that makes their learning curve relatively simple, it is as if the options I need are always available. the hand and not within complicated menus or overloaded interfaces

Incentivized

Microsoft SharePoint is a simpler alternative for OpenText eDOCS. It can be used for the same objectives, i.e. to share and manage content, search for information, and collaborate across business areas. Integration with other applications and platforms can be rather limited, in comparison to OpenText eDOCS, but the interface can be considered cleaner than the one of OpenText.

Incentivized

• Automated document conversion using Hot Folder heavily reduced workload [for] our IT Support department.
• The amount of storage required for digitized paper documents has been reduced by 30%.
• Ability to compare multilingual documents has increased productivity of our multinational departments.

Incentivized

• Pros: providing secure application so that we do not worry about security perspective much.
• Pros : Ease of use.
• Pros : Accessible via mobile, tablets, cloud, laptops.
• Cons: Complex.
• Cons : Pricing can be improved.

Incentivized