TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) vs. IBM Cloud Managed Istio

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a scalable, high performance container management service that supports Docker containers.

    $0

    per hour per GB

    IBM Cloud Managed Istio

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AThe IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service provides the Managed Istio installation add on, designed to provide additonal control over clusters and the microservices they comprise via automatic updates and lifecycle management of control plane components, and integration with platform logging and monitoring tools.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Editions & Modules
    AWS Fargate Launch Type Model
    Spot price: $0.0013335. Ephemeral Storage Pricing: $0.000111
    per hour per storage
    Amazon EC2 Launch Type Model
    Free
    Amazon ECS on AWS Outposts
    Free
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThere is no additional charge for Amazon ECS. You pay for AWS resources (e.g., Amazon EC2 instances or Amazon EBS volumes) you create to store and run your application. You only pay for what you use, as you use it; there are no minimum fees and no upfront commitments.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    8.1
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration8.45 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery8.46 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings6.95 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings7.95 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings8.75 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.65 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.25 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Kubernetes
    Score9.1 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SUSE Rancher
    Score9.4 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (12 ratings)
    8.7
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.4
    (4 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)IBM Cloud Managed Istio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon ECS is well suited for the scenarios where you want to deploy a microservice to a cloud and instead of manually specifying instance size, number of instances and then specifying the configurations and connecting it with other cloud services like database service, secret manager service etc., you just want to specify these configurations as a file and using that file, the ECS would deploy the service and keep it healthy. It might be less suited for a scenario when you don't want to stick to AWS specific solution for your microservice deployment. The ECS configuration file is specific to AWS ECS and may not be useful for other cloud providers like Azure etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Clearly, the [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] tool is very useful when you have multiple services and each service is connecting with other services through APIs in different networks. To manage this type of complex network, [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] is very useful. It comes with a license that can increase the billing of your project so make sure if your application network mesh, monitoring cannot be managed on your own then you can use it. If your application is not very complex then you have many tools available like Grafana, Prometheus, Sumo Logic, which you can integrate individually with your cluster and implement. In this type of scenario, it is better to not use [IBM Cloud Managed Istio] and it will serve your purpose as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • One of the biggest advantages is the flexibility to change underlying EC2 instances. As the traffic or demand increases, we can easily change EC2 instances without any issues.
    • Amazon ECS APIs are extremely robust and one can start and stop containers by firing one post request only. So, it is not mandatory to keep the demo solutions up for every time. Just at the time of demo fire the command - make the container up and running - do the demo - down the container with API. A simple portal can control every container which helps non-technical (sales, marketing) to do the demo without keeping the solutions up for the entire time frame.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Layers transparently onto existing applications
    • Allows control of access and rules to be developed
    • Creates metrics for usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Another AWS Service - While AWS has a service for just about everything, that is also a negative point. There is no service that does 4 out of 4 things you need. This service does 3 out of 4, another service does the fourth thing you need and another two things that the other service does.
    • With AWS things in general, it's really hard to remain cloud agnostic. Keep that in mind.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Some more functionalities added could improve it better.
    • Better technical user guidance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Aside from some ECS-specific terms to learn at first, learning & starting to use ECS is relatively straightforward. AWS docs on the topic are also of high quality, with sound & relevant examples to follow. Troubleshooting container issues is also a breeze thanks to CloudWatch integration & helpful error messages on the AWS console.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Support is relatively good, although the documentation sometimes is lacking, as well as outdated in our experience, especially when we initiated the process of using this service. But once we found how to assemble things, we haven't really required support from anyone at AWS, the service works without problems so we haven't had the need to contact support, which speaks well of how ECS is built.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Training and usage support available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    I chose Amazon ECS over Amazon EKS and other products because the whole infrastructure was decided to be designed on AWS cloud and Amazon ECS made it easier to make the clusters live in just a few minutes. Amazon ECS has better integration with other AWS services and we don't have to look for plugins to do the things, everything is available and can be configured from the AWS console.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Easy to manage as it has an orchestrator to manage the containers.
    • Less costs and more flexibility with Fargate.
    • Negative (tied to AWS, so could not easily integrate other tools like running a Redis cluster. Still, it works but not easily like Kubernetes.
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It reduced the complexity of network mesh (ingress/egress services).
    • One tool with many solutions. No need to integrate monitoring tools or notification tools.
    • It reduced the number of lines of YAML code.
    • It reduced the number of labor hours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots