Anaplan vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaplan
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Anaplan is a scenario planning and analysis platform designed to optimize decision-making in complex business environments so that enterprises can outpace their competition and the market. By building connections and collaboration across organizational silos, the Anaplan platform surfaces key insights.N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
AnaplanVena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnaplanVena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnaplanVena
Considered Both Products
Anaplan
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan was cheaper or similar cost to the competition.
Anaplan was able to fit more use cases.
Anaplan was a flexible modeling tool that had greater future project potential compared to other tools.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is an evolution of classic EPM tools like SAP BPC. It is simply a much easier system to maintain and roll-out. Dashboards are very user friendly and the Excel add-in is just as powerful. Anaplan excels at connected planning where all models are connected and rolled up …
Chose Anaplan
I believe Anaplan is a more complete tool with a wider range of use-cases and more true connected planning.
Chose Anaplan
Very comparable products and recommendation depends on technology footprint within organization
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is not a point solution. Instead of having multiple systems that each do one business process (and can only do that business process in one way), Anaplan can do many different business processes for multiple business units. Sales, Finance, HR and other parts of the …
Chose Anaplan
Jedox has limited the standard dimensions to 6 only in the financial workspace. If you need any other custom dimension, it has to be defined in analytical workspace. However, data interchange between Financial Workspace and Analytical workspaces are not real-time and rely on …
Chose Anaplan
Essbase/HFM were hosted on-prem and required regular maintenance from the vendor. The tools were good at the simple tasks of consolidation and relatively simple allocation/calculations. Anaplan is a cloud-hosted platform that can be accessed almost anywhere with an internet …
Chose Anaplan
Creating financial forecasts in Anaplan was a big improvement over doing the same activity in Microsoft Excel. The main difference is that Anaplan makes it easier to build models based on large amounts of data and to forecast concurrently with many users across your …
Chose Anaplan
I think Anaplan is a better and more mature product than SAP SAC, but SAC has a better integration with its core modules and BW platforms.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan offers faster performance. The modelling tool is user oriented.
Chose Anaplan
We like Anaplan for its flexibility, out-of-the-box starting apps, speed to deploy, and ability to maintain long-term.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan feels like the golden standard. Pigment lacks necessary functionality like actions.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan vs Oracle Hyperion - Anaplan is far better calculation engine and way more modern. However, Anaplan still struggles to provide reporting, especially adhoc reporting in excel based off a data model.

Anaplan vs Pigment - Anaplan is a more proven product, however, Pigment …
Chose Anaplan
Definitely a leader in the space. Far ahead in terms of capabilities. On the high end in terms of end user experience.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is easier to implement, easier to use, easier to maintain than these tools. It scales easily with the business. Workflows are easy to implement. It is easy to drill down and understand how the tool obtained a specific result, giving confidence in its calculations. …
Chose Anaplan
Easy of use is Anaplan's main advantage. As Anaplan is code-less configuration, and the logic for model building is by far the simplest, it would make the learning curve less steep. This is very important when we are showing our clients that, their complicated planning scenario …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is one of the only tools flexible to handle bespoke commission calculations. In addition to Sales Performance Management, Anaplan can be used to support other business functions, such as workforce planning or financial planning & analysis. Anaplan provides the …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is a proven tool for scalable applications and is flexible to support multiple use cases. Its support is established and the user community is strong. Resources to support the product are readily available.
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan is more powerful than Pigment considering that it is an Enterprise class system and is able to manage bigger data sets. Anaplan allows for advanced scenario modeling and formula capabilities along with custom reporting functionalities. Anaplan has proven its …
Chose Anaplan
Anaplan and these other tools are very similar. I cannot say that I selected Anaplan over them as I have worked with and been involved with setting up a number of tools for clients. They all have their advantages and Anaplan is a very strong tool in the cloud planning space.
Chose Anaplan
can be implemented across multiple use cases- also Anaplan is an enterprise solution. Had good reviews in market and also used by other competitors in industry
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena is much more user friendly but Python does allow for more custom reporting
Chose Vena
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining …
Chose Vena
We went with Vena as the alternatives felt like everything was contained in the box, and would have required more IT department assistance than we had bandwidth for.
Chose Vena
Vena is much better for customization and data representation. It gives us much more flexibility in how we show our information to stakeholders. We need our information to be digestible for non-financial employees, and with that flexibility to show things how we want, we are …
Chose Vena
we did our diligence when selecting Vena. I do not want to disparage other products so I will not list them. However, we were extremely thorough and gauged all offerings on multiple criteria. Big players and small players. We are very happy with our Decision to go with Vena.
Chose Vena
Oracle is more clunky and prone to stats breaking while Vena is more streamlined.
Chose Vena
Solver was more user friendly in the report building, but Vena has more functionalities
Chose Vena
My experience was that OneStream lacked driver-based planning. I still had to build models in excel and then upload my numbers into OneStream.
Chose Vena
Vena was much easier to implement, and more user friendly
Chose Vena
Vena has a much more arsenal of AI features.
Chose Vena
we liked that Vena was fully integrated into Excel and we were already doing all our manual work within excel and creating all our reports and templates so we thought that only made sense to use Vena as it was most comfortable for us
Chose Vena
We selected Vena due to it being Excel based.
Chose Vena
I think from the finance perspective specifically, Vena is more clear and easy to read. Besides, the report that Vena generates is more reliable and realistic in our case. But we do integrate the data from Workday to Vena every month. So we use the both platforms for our …
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because the product worked in Excel, so there was less of a training curve for people, because all of other people work with cell users and we also chose it better because of the people, the sales reps, and the implementation teams. You know, the processes that …
Chose Vena
Vena is Excel-based, which is what our users wanted. Pigment was web-based, like Adaptive, but our users did not fully trust or adopt it. Adoption drives success for any software. Amy's software, which is not adopted, has a negative ROI by definition. Vena was the right choice …
Chose Vena
Playful is complex and not user friendly. There was no customer support so we had to pay a third party consultant and it was expensive
Chose Vena
Vena has more capabilities that we saw during demos
Chose Vena
The main reason was because Vena was Excel based and would allow us to replicate our budget templates and limit the change management for our users
Chose Vena
Vena is more customizable in my opinion
Features
AnaplanVena
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Vena
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports6.40 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.40 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.90 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.1
Ratings
16% above category average
Vena
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.10 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
Vena
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web8.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Versioning8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.10 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.10 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.40 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Vena
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.10 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.80 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Vena
7.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Mobile Application6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.90 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning9.40 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.50 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Forecasting9.10 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Management reporting7.30 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Vena
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Financial data consolidation8.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.50 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.30 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.30 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.30 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.80 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management Reporting8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting8.20 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.20 Ratings8.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.9
Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.60 Ratings9.10 Ratings
KPIs9.10 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.90 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.10 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Vena
8.1
Ratings
0% above category average
Flat file integration9.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Excel data integration8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnaplanVena
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnaplanVena
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.2
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnaplanVena
Likelihood to Recommend
With its versions and native time features Anaplan is well suited for all activities around planning in time and scenarios. Tasks involving calculating across multiple dimensions make Anaplan shine - the easiness to build complex calculation and present results on customizable pages. With its access restrictions it's well suited also for working with sensitive data (employee and customers personal data).
Read full review
It’s great for achieving flexible outcomes amid ever-changing desires among its user base. We have not implemented AI into our finances quite yet, but this seems very promising for working more efficiently in analysis and narrative prep. It works great for constant real-time data and allows us to make decisions on the fly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Anaplan removes the time consuming process of integrating the results of individual spreadsheets.
  • Anaplan facilitates the standardization of assumptions across all sub-processes
  • Anaplan provides full transparency of the calculations and source inputs
  • Anaplan allows us to automate certain planning processes that would have been impossible when relying on the computational capabilities of an individual computer.
Read full review
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
Cons
  • Ability to decide if to apply the formula or a manual input on front end for each line item
  • Real Time Data Transfer across models. Currently Data is transferred using Processes across different models. Having a functionality to access data from any model in real time would be great
Read full review
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anaplan is already an established market leader in enterprise planning area. Its flexibility to build multi-dimensional models, real time scenario plannings are proven to be the best features and successfully implemented by global organizations. Anaplan's ambitious product team is ensuring to roll out new features regularly based on customer/ partner feedback. e.g their new improved polaris environment has strong potential to build very large models without worrying about sparsity. The integration with other tools/technologies is being easier (e.g. cloudworks). Hence, considering Anaplan as a platform that has proved to be successful tool in enterprise level planning, its focus on regular feature enhancements and future release roadmaps I believe this platform has potential to evolve further along with our business processes and requirements
Read full review
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Usability
As a user it is a very simple tool, but at the same time with a very mature and powerful calculation engine. It is very easy to switch from excel or traditional tools with added capabilities of multi dimensionality and real time calculation engine to see quick insights needed to create plans and scenarios
Read full review
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
There are very few outages. Maintenance is scheduled on two or three Saturdays per month, so as not to affect businesses. When there is an outage, users are kept informed of progress to restore the platform and typically this takes no more than an hour. Anaplan customer support is very responsive if we ever have questions about platform issues
Read full review
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Performance
Unless a model is poorly constructed, the platform can accommodate tens or even hundreds of users without any impact on model performance. Dashboard pages load quickly, reports can be exported to Excel or pdf quickly, and integrations with other systems can be scheduled for quiet times of the day. Adding new use cases to the platform should also have minimal impact on performance if done in a careful way and following best practice principles
Read full review
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support quality has dropped since Thoma Bravo has taken over. I think some serious re-focus needs to happen here -- part of the beauty of being in the Anaplan community was how involved you felt in it before. Before I didn't dread sending a support ticket, now I am starting to.
Read full review
Their general support is pretty responsive (max 24 hours) but when you work directly through one of their CSMs then the response time can be much faster. If you purchase coaching hours then you can get things sorted out pretty quick. Over time you learn the software and need support less, but it's always helpful to have it ready when you need it
Read full review
In-Person Training
In my opinion, in-person training is always the best if you have the option to do so. This allows real-time interactions with the instructions, whereas the online training I took required me to write-down questions, email them, and wait for responses. This slows down the process, as you can imagine. That said, in-person training is an extra cost and it likely isn't needed for everyone. I would suggest selecting a small number of people to take in-person training and then having them act as mentors to the rest of your team. That way, as the rest of the team takes the online training, they have a resource to help them in real time.
Read full review
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Online Training
Learning made easy . One of the best trainings i have attended. Training was very detailed training by the trainer, which helped me understand the basics of the model building. Level 1 training was easy and instructor was most helpful here. Level 2 training was challenging but was able to go thru due to understanding of the basics.
Read full review
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Agile methodology and breaking the work down into sprints was very helpful. Implementation required a deeper dive into our data than expected for the consultants to be able to construct the data model. But once it was in place, the focus on knowledge transfer enabled us to be able to use the product effectively after the team rolled off.
Read full review
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Anaplan is not a point solution. Instead of having multiple systems that each do one business process (and can only do that business process in one way), Anaplan can do many different business processes for multiple business units. Sales, Finance, HR and other parts of the business can go to one place to get their work done.
Read full review
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis by centralizing information and improving collaboration.
Read full review
Scalability
We have managed to leverage Anaplan for financial planning and forecasting across the business. It is now used by almost every department, with more than 50 users (but I know of companies that have hundreds of users) and still the platform is quick and reliable. It is easy to make changes to divisions and departments or add users and apply different user settings - the core part of the model is not affected and end users can continue their work without any disruption
Read full review
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • You will see greater accuracy within your forecasts by leveraging Anaplan to look at historical values while including projections such as seasonality.
  • You will save time, resulting in team members spending more time on value-add opportunities.
  • You will have happy end users that have access to self-service reports, removing any bottlenecks through the workflow.
Read full review
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Anaplan Screenshots

Screenshot of a preview of the Anaplan login page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan home page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan board.

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard