TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about GitLab

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

GitLab

Connect with GitLab

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with GitLab so that GitLab and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apache Subversion

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/AApache Subversion is a version control option that is free to download and open source under the Apache 2.0 license.N/A

    GitLab

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AGitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, where software teams enable AI at every stage of the software lifecycle to ship faster. The platform enables teams to automate repetitive tasks across planning, building, securing, testing, deploying, and maintaining software.

    $0

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab Free (self-managed)
    $0
    GitLab Free
    $0
    GitLab Premium
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Premium (self-managed)
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Ultimate
    Contact Sales
    GitLab Ultimate (self-managed)
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—GitLab Credits enable flexible, consumption-based access to agentic AI capabilities in the GitLab platform, allowing you to scale AI adoption at your own pace while maintaining cost predictability. Powered by Duo Agent Platform, GitLab’s agentic AI capabilities help software teams to collaborate at AI speed, without compromising quality and enterprise security. If usage exceeds monthly allocations and overage terms are accepted, automated on-demand billing activates without service interruption, so your developers never lose access to AI capabilities they need. Real-time dashboards provide transparency into AI consumption patterns. Software teams can see usage across users, projects, and groups with granular attribution for cost allocation. Automated threshold alerts facilitate proactive planning. Advanced analytics deliver trending, forecasting, and FinOps integration.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Considered Both Products
    Apache
    No answer on this topic
    GitLab
    Chose GitLab
    GitLab is miles ahead of the competition. In so many words, having a simple UI with robust security and the ability to conduct Git actions takes the cake. The competitions like to say they can do these things easily but their products are more confusing and hard to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Git has a Distributed Model. SVN has a Centralized Model. In git every user has their own copy of code on their local like their own branch. In SVN there is central repository has working copy that also make changes and committed in central repository
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    GitLab is distributed version control system unlike Subversion (SVN) is a centralized version control system. Multiple developers can work on the same file simultaneously unlike Subversion (SVN) if a developer locked a file other developers can not change it. GitLab provides a …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Earlier we used SVN as our SCM tool. SVN was a centralized version control system due to which developers had to connect to the server every time they needed to commit. It was causing trouble for developers considering the large Org size. Also, SVN does not have a robust CI …
    Incentivized
    Chose GitLab
    Above and beyond Perforce and subversion, close to github.com but a lot cheaper (CE edition)
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    150 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    135 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    152 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    120 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Small Businesses
    GitHub
    Score9.2 out of 10
    GitGuardian
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Git
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Perforce P4
    Score7.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.6
    (10 ratings)
    8.6
    (168 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    3.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (20 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apache SubversionGitLab
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apache
    It's a relatively simple version control system so it works great for an individual or small team (less than 10 people). But if you have a medium to large team, especially one with members distributed over a large geographic area, or one where individuals need to be able to work "offline" without access to a central server, Apache Subversion will likely not be the best choice.
    Also, if you're maintaining an open-source project where outside people will be interacting with your code repository, git is probably a better choice because it's becoming the de-facto standard these days and what most developers are familiar with.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    In general it's a good product with a huge number of features. It can do CI/CD checks, deployment, repo hosting, integrations etc. A lot of it can be managed from just the UI but also has an ok API. It does tend to release new features semi-often too which is nice. It can have a steep learning curve for certain features so not a starter-friendly vendor, but great for most businesses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apache
    • Revision control done properly - you have end to end visibility of all changes in the project.
    • Conflict resolution - visually highlighting the differences helps to track down the problem.
    • Being open source and very popular.
    • We are using SVN hosted in our network - it is very stable, we had almost zero downtime in 4 years.
    • Rollbacks are made simple and easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
    • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
    • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
    • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apache
    • Distributed development - I've never worked in an environment where distributed development (developers widely scattered geographically) was a factor, but that's why git exists.
    • Merging - Merging of code from one branch to another can be painful, especially if it's not done frequently. (On the other hand, doing merges is one of the reasons I get a nice salary, so I can't complain too much!)
    • Acceptance - Let's face it, git is what "all the cool kids are using." If you've got a bunch of developers fresh out of school, they'll probably know git and not Subversion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
    • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
    • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apache
    While there are interesting alternatives, such a GIT, Subversion has been a breath of fresh air compared to its predecessors like CVS or Microsoft Source Safe (now called Team Foundation Server). Its ease of use and high adoption rate is going to keep me using this product for years to come.
    Read full review
    GitLab
    I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    - As a combination of features and products, GitLab is a really great tool for developers. - Also, it comes with both light and quick changes in a web browser version, as well as pro work in VS Code mode. However, in certain areas, such as large-scale issues/incidents, management can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apache
    Git has become the new standard of version control, with its support for distributed design. As a tool to manage and control versions, Subversion does it well, but Git is the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    GitHub is an inferior product from most points of view. We had to use it and the teams finds no positives about it. Everything is a downgrade from our previous GitLab solution. GitLab CI\CD is vastly superior to workflows, for example doing a manual node is just "when : manual" in GitLab while you have to do clickops in GitHub to achieve the same. No overview of code in branches is a minus when we tried to figure out what our colleagues are trying to merge as it looked off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apache
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apache
    • Subversion helps us feel secure in maintaining access to all of our product code, both current and historical.
    • Being free and open source makes it an even better "investment".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
    • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
    • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GitLab Screenshots

    Screenshot of What is Intelligent Orchestration for DevSecOps?Screenshot of an overview of GitLab Duo Agent PlatformScreenshot of a new agent creation screen