Appian vs Celonis

• Quick development
• Integrating with other systems

Read full review

• Provide big picture information and drill down to details, such as actors, cases, documents
• Combine process discovery data with other business, e.g. controlling data
• Great user interface
• Unlike other products such as Minit or Disco, this tool is great at being able to directly enrich the findings with cost or revenue data
• Easy to build and calculate critical process KPIs and demonstrate the findings to management (decision makers)

Read full review

• Expression Rule Editor has a lot of room for improvement, as it is not as easy as other IDE internment
• Adding features to debug and trace code in editors and process models.
• Adding features to accept anonymous objects in process model instead of just strong typed objects.
• A better way to handle multiple calls for smart activities in a process model.
• More easy ways to navigate objects in the Designer tool

Read full review

• It works with SAP HANA. Unfortunately, we did not succeed with connecting it to the older SAP versions
• Working with data models is not easy. The data model has to be 100% correct, otherwise the results bring confusion (either visible or not visible) or the model does not provide any data
• Support for all standard SAP modules

Read full review

• Not yet clear, though it is expected to have a positive return on investment and be a significant upgrade from the system previously in place
• External companies will have an easier more efficient time interacting with the agency for which I work, which should see an increase in use and registrations through Appian

Read full review

• Using Celonis speeds up the whole company by restructuring projects. It saves time and human work.
• Celonis provides perfect transparency - as well as other process mining tools - but it goes further. It allows us to combine the process KPIs with, for example, cost or revenue data.
• Enables us to make decisions based on real-life numbers.

Read full review