ASP.NET

ASP.NET

172 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ASP.NET	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	N/A	N/A

Pricing

ASP.NET

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ASP.NET
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ASP.NET
Considered Both Products	ASP.NET Verified User Engineer Chose ASP.NET We switched from django monolyth to .net microservices with ms sql accounting operations. May not be apple to apples comparison but we found ourselves in better place after the switch Incentivized Helpful? BV Bas Verschuren Service Engineer Chose ASP.NET We selected ASP.Net because of the market position. It is well known in combination with visual studio and IIS. Also, new colleagues know this and can be involved very quickly. No need to make a lot of investment in education. We do need to teach them the guidelines of our … Incentivized Helpful? Sean Haddy Senior Software Engineer Chose ASP.NET As a previous developer in Java and PHP, I’ve found Asp.net to be much more user-friendly and better structured than the competition. Code completion, library availability, stack runtime, debugging, and general workflow are definitely a level up in my experience. Visual Studio … Incentivized Helpful? Fernando Roque Statistical Analyst Chose ASP.NET We choose ASP.NET because our core business is working with the SAP HANA database using SAP Business One. We can develop state-of-the-art applications with Razor and Visual Studio 2022 fast and with excellent application performance response. Working SAP Hana with JAVA could … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose ASP.NET ASP.NET and Visual Studio are the best combo to develop web applications faster and securely. This accelerates the implementation time of projects and the improvement of web applications. Incentivized Helpful? Ali Abu Fkhideh Senior Technical Consultant Chose ASP.NET There is a big difference between the two technologies, ASP.Net is more organized, more secured, the tools you can use for developing ASP.Net is way stronger and better supported, ASP.Net itself is more secured than PHP. Incentivized Helpful? Georgios Diamantopoulos Senior System Architect Chose ASP.NET NodeJS is a popular technology because, in my opinion, when it was introduced it made significant improvements on how easy it was to work with a familiar language (JS) on the server-side. But, now that it's no more a new technology and other competitors have caught up, I find … Incentivized Helpful? Al Mubassir Muin Software Engineer Chose ASP.NET It’s possible to do the same thing with Apache, Nodejs, and so on. ASP.NET is easier to learn than other programs on their own, making it more accessible. Deploying and maintaining the application is a lot easier once you’ve completed the installation process. With each passing … Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose ASP.NET I have used things like Java Struts in my time and I have found technologies from that era are often quite alike. They were a big step forward at the time - but I think there are better things to use now. ASP.NET and Struts were in that same era, they still work really well and … Incentivized Helpful? Brendan McKenna Principal Developer Chose ASP.NET I don't like javascript that much, personally. Having a backend built on top of javascript in the case of Node.js leaves me lying awake at night. I prefer strongly typed languages and knowing I have the support of Microsoft behind my choice of systems. Node.js when I … Incentivized Helpful? Pritesh Patel Product Manager, Partnerships & Data Services Chose ASP.NET [ASP.NET] is built over a very solid framework, that for sure developers can depend on, and through the years it evolved very well to serve the market and developers need, with the different versions and design patterns it has you will always be able to do all the stuff needed … Incentivized Helpful? Anthony Aziz Senior Software Engineer Chose ASP.NET ASP.NET has continuously delivered improvements and expanded compatibility over the past years. It integrates nicely with our existing applications and frameworks without being too invasive. Incentivized Helpful? RK Rahul Kapoor Software Engineer Chose ASP.NET Other products could be used to do the same what ASP.NET achieves. For server code Nodejs could be used and for front-end Reactjs, Angular etc. could be used. What ASP.NET achieves is that you can do this combined thing in one framework. So learning is easy as compared to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose ASP.NET ASP.NET makes it a lot easier to integrate with other systems, especially Microsoft services. It is much easier to make backend API's without too much code. There is good support from Microsoft and there is a huge community of developers. And as Zend Framework most is now open … Incentivized Helpful? Viral Patel Senior Software Engineer Chose ASP.NET We had MSDN subscriptions, and developers had this extensive skillset. Faster and easier than any other tools. The client also had apps running on an IIS server. Incentivized Helpful? Mithila Samarasinghe Apparel Manufacturing, Circuler Knitting Technical, Factory Design & Construction Consultant, Chose ASP.NET I will not select again and will not advise to use our clients Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose ASP.NET Familiarity, convenience, some of the core activities are built-in, good documentation. Incentivized Helpful? Kyle Kochtan Technical Lead Chose ASP.NET ASP.NET is much easier to work with and ramp up than any other product that we tried. ASP.NET was also significantly cheaper to start coding with. We also had the resources on hand so we did not need to hire contractors or consultants, which also allowed us to go faster and … Incentivized Helpful? Sean Patterson Software Development Director Chose ASP.NET ASP.Net is more feature rich compared to the Laravel PHP Framework, which is why we eventually chose it. Laravel does make for a quicker "first start" when building an application, but the long term investment we needed in features and functionality caused us to weigh in favor … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose ASP.NET Perl and Ruby on Rails were also evaluated as possible options to solve our business needs. ASP.NET is, of course, more expensive, but provided a robust and somewhat easier integration of the specific tool-set required to provide excellent service to our customers. The … Incentivized Helpful? Sagiv Frankel Co-Founder Chose ASP.NET Compared to other Monolithic solutions like Java, ASP.NET can certainly hold its own. C# along with .NET functionality is a lot more robust In my opinion then Java Spring or Java Struts. The documentation and configuration is a lot better and a lot better maintained. However I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose ASP.NET PHP and the many associated frameworks are probably the main similar products around - however, the diversity and open source nature of these things can mean you are building on a moving foundation - the stability offered by ASP.NET is a plus for me and my team. The lie of the … Incentivized Helpful? Erik Zanker Visualization Technologies Lead (Software Engineer) Chose ASP.NET Compared to plain HTML/CSS/JS, ASP.Net adds many productivity tools and frameworks that allow for more rapid and robust development. Incentivized Helpful? Milan Shah Technical Architect Chose ASP.NET The in-house framework of ASP.NET reduces a lot of boilerplate code and also easier to start. The development environment is amazingly faster. Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Web applications Pro Sql server Pro Set up
Top Cons	Minus Front end Minus Web forms Minus Test automation

Best Alternatives
	ASP.NET
Small Businesses	Visual Studio Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Visual Studio Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	Visual Studio Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ASP.NET
Likelihood to Recommend	8.9 (38 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	8.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ASP.NET
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft Well suited: for interfaces between machines data and applications. Made as a service. For web applications in factories where you don't have access to thick clients due to the environment. not well suited: quick measurements and fast data transitions between different applications. When time dependency is needed, then you better can choose other solutions. Incentivized BV Bas Verschuren Service Engineer Read full review
Pros	Microsoft It has a great documentation so new or experienced, you appreciate quick access to quality information It’s very fast, uses less memory than initially expected that has decreased our costs after moving from python It speaks the language of the design patterns really well, so our backend apps are written fast together and connect to frontend systems flawlessly Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Microsoft Net is just like plug and play, we have to focus on a logic of code rest part can be handled by ASP. Net framework. It's a best for only web development. One downside with ASP.NET is its reliance on the .NET framework. Incentivized Pritesh Patel Product Manager, Partnerships & Data Services Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Microsoft It is the backbone of all our products Incentivized Erik Zanker Visualization Technologies Lead (Software Engineer) Read full review
Support Rating	Microsoft Very good, depending on the requirement and budget. Incentivized Viral Patel Senior Software Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft We choose ASP.NET because our core business is working with the SAP HANA database using SAP Business One. We can develop state-of-the-art applications with Razor and Visual Studio 2022 fast and with excellent application performance response. Working SAP Hana with JAVA could be more challenging because it has fewer developers communities, and it could be harder to find a solution for a question. Incentivized Fernando Roque Statistical Analyst Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft We realized positive returns due to interns and new employees already having experience due to the free academic versions available. Being able to evaluate the express version prior to purchase was helpful. Performance is adequate, but not as responsive as C++. I guess the trade-off is ease of use and being able to find qualified personnel. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots