Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
GoTo Webinar
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
GoToWebinar is GoTo’s webinar and online conferencing solution, and offers features like audience polling and Q&A, flexible scheduling experiences, and webinar templates. It offers CRM integrations and reporting & analytics tools to help engage clients’ audiences.
$49
per month per organizer
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Lite
$49/month
per month per organizer
Standard
$99/month
per month per organizer
Pro
$199/month
per month per organizer
Enterprise
$399/month
per month per organizer
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Considered Multiple Products
Confluence
Chose Atlassian Confluence
I think both are good
Chose Atlassian Confluence
We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
I personally prefer the usage of alternative project management or document storage apps. Atlassian Confluence is useful in having a centralised spot for multiple types of information, as opposed to Trello for example, and is much more structured. However, it has low visual …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
It integrates well with other SAAS products and has been our industry standard for all projects that we're involved in.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
The way the knowledge is stored and indexed in Atlassian Confluence is very advanced so that it can be easily accessed. It supports including images, links, etc so that we can convey the idea very well. Overall it's very useful for organizations where new features are rolled …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is more intuitive than MS SharePoint, however, SharePoint has some reach features because of the MS integration with its tools stack.
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Confluence smashes competitors out of the ballpark. There is no compromise for quality and great product design with Atlassian
Chose Atlassian Confluence
Google Drive is not comparable to confluence, but it was the only other means for collaboration of documents and a shared hub for resources. But it serves more as a folder for resources rather than a repository of pages in information with links, documents, collaboration, …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
There are complementary and we are in fact using both of them in out organisation. We are using Google Drive for advanced real-time cooperation when creating documents, since Google Drive can handle this in a more streamlined and easier way than Confluence. Still, Confluence …
Chose Atlassian Confluence
I have used other tools that allow for documentation and housing of other business-related documents but none that I used had the same integration or general ability to add and edit information. I am also a general user so I don't know how easy/difficult the backend is, but …
GoTo Webinar
Chose GoTo Webinar
Microsoft Teams does not offer the same level of flexibility or customization that [GoTo Webinar] has, so that is rather limiting. Also, MicrosoftTeams does not have a decent report program in place. Airmeet has some neat features and decent interactive features between the …
Chose GoTo Webinar
GoTo Webinar works very much like Microsoft Teams for meetings. The features of each are very comparable. However, GoTo Webinar's pricing model is more affordable.
Chose GoTo Webinar
• GoToWebinar is better suited for external-facing webinars with a focus on marketing. training, or customer engagement. Its strength lies in detailed reporting, audience interaction tools, and ease of use for creating webinars
Microsoft Teams (Live Events) is ideal for …
Chose GoTo Webinar
Teams is also a good option but sharing the screen is handy but I don't think in Zoom. So both can be used. GoTo webinar has a good feature which is starting the publish so recording and sharing will start only after that once we are ready. Other platforms are also good but …
Chose GoTo Webinar
It was already a component of the tech stack before COVID, but with the introduction of numerous new platforms that are utilized on a daily basis for purposes other than webinars, it is currently not the greatest option for marketers. It's a useful addition to the tech stack, …
Chose GoTo Webinar
We used TeamViewer and Skype for Business before this and we had a tough time conducting webinars when the target audience was huge. Lack of integrations with 3rd party platforms, and no analytics capabilities limited ourselves from going to the next level in both sales and …
Chose GoTo Webinar
GoToWebinar has a user-friendly interface and intuitive controls. When comparing it with other platforms, assess how easily you can navigate through features, set up events, and engage with participants. Connection stability, audio and video quality seem pretty much ok. …
Chose GoTo Webinar
All of the other platforms are nice as well but something that has GoTo webinar is that it uses a software in your computer that makes the session to be more reliable and does not consume high ram or rom in your device. It has nice features to remind the people about the …
Chose GoTo Webinar
The tool was one of the first and most used tools before pandemic struck and many other IT companies converted and/or launched their live stream8ng softwares for education management. The system is reliable, accessible through different devices and optimal for managing large …
Chose GoTo Webinar
Super-smooth video and fantastic audio with an extended range of volume control. Other vendors can claim their product is a superior choice; however, in my history of experiencing multiple options, GoTo Webinar gets my highest marks!
Chose GoTo Webinar
Is faster, has better interactive tools and features. Sound is better and has more board options for presentations
Chose GoTo Webinar
Zoom is the biggest and most well-known competitor. We use both, although lately have been using Zoom more. I think they both can be good, but I think GoToWebinar offers more participant and engagement data, and also makes it easier to share files. But Zoom is more …
Chose GoTo Webinar
GoToWebinar was a familiar brand name and people in the education industry were using it daily. It was easy to use and we were able to host large-scale webinars. The video quality was superior and we were able to edit it easily and publish it externally. Overall, a simple …
Chose GoTo Webinar
My CEO choose our products, but I imagine he selected it for the ease, the safeguards to the business, and it integrates well with the tools we already use!
Chose GoTo Webinar
GoTo Webinar has better usability and a user-friendly interface. It is one of the collaboration tools that is favored by our staff. It easily facilitates in-meeting messaging and encourages open dialogue. It is a great tool that can facilitate virtual staff meetings. Attendees …
Chose GoTo Webinar
Actually we use both MS Teams and Go To Webinar for different use cases as I already described in the very first question. Zoom is of course also valuable but as we already have Teams and GoTo Webinar I think we dont really need so many tools that do the same thing.
Chose GoTo Webinar
I like GoTo Webinar better than these platforms because of its ability to hose large scale events and allow users to interact more freely. Many times the meetings we are using this for are meant to be a dialogue rather than a monologue and this system allows this to flow much …
Chose GoTo Webinar
It was selected because of the following reason: It tightly integrates with other regs. platforms like Cvent It is easy to configure and maintain. It offers nice interactive features like polling questions, transcription, etc. It offers nice data analytics post any event to …
Chose GoTo Webinar
Our target audience is within the financial sector and we struggled with security walls blocking their access to join Zoom or Teams meetings. ON24 seems to be one level up from GoTo Webinar when it comes to customization and a better UX. My new company now uses ON24 because of …
Chose GoTo Webinar
GoToWebinar is on par with other leading webinar platforms and a little more price competitive.
Chose GoTo Webinar
Zoom I have found extremely hard to explain and use. Sometimes hard to show if you are on mute when using a mobile device whereas on GoToMeeting you are easily able to see the faces of others and if you are muted or not. That is helpful when traveling and using the app.
Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a complementary tool I used in my software panel. So it can cover many cases where partners are not using the same tools as the ones used in my firm. It is a complementary tool with other ones like Miro, Slack, and Jira, for example, in order to facilitate …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is just a nicer front end to SharePoint for file and document management but it also has a good communication network for internal and external parties. It's easy to use on mobile device as well. It also integrates well with Microsoft Power Platform etc, meaning …
Chose Microsoft Teams
With Microsoft Teams you can better check each one's agenda. The background when in a meeting is better. Microsoft Teams also have more options for integrations in place.
It's also easier and more intuitive.
It also offers more options of communicating and not only video …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Although competitors such as Slack and Webex can really stand up to MS Teams, our organization chose Teams as the predominant work communicator. Working within this decision, we are overall happy with the feature set that Teams provides. In my opinion, the advantages of its …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams edges above the conferencing competition by allowing file collaboration and ongoing group chats with coworkers. We selected Microsoft Teams for all our video & audio conference calls for it's ability to integrate with our Outlook client and make it easy for …
Chose Microsoft Teams
We used Adium in the past for our direct department and HipChat company-wide. I didn't mind HipChat so much, but it didn't have nearly as many features as Teams offers. Adium was a big pain in my butt because it is used for not just the company, but everything else you are …
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Teams is ahead of the game. Its tight integration with the Microsoft suite has no rival. Having Azure as the backend provides a secure environment in the cloud with content accessible anytime anywhere. Microsoft is heavily investing in the product and constantly adding …
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.0
157 Ratings
10% below category average
GoTo Webinar
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.8
233 Ratings
0% above category average
Task Management7.1125 Ratings00 Ratings7.8172 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings7.590 Ratings
Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings7.9200 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.389 Ratings00 Ratings8.0120 Ratings
Mobile Access6.7116 Ratings00 Ratings8.1221 Ratings
Search6.8155 Ratings00 Ratings7.3204 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.2126 Ratings00 Ratings8.3137 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
157 Ratings
1% below category average
GoTo Webinar
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
7.9
242 Ratings
1% below category average
Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings8.9241 Ratings
Notifications8.2154 Ratings00 Ratings8.2240 Ratings
Discussions7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings8.5227 Ratings
Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings8.0138 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.0148 Ratings00 Ratings8.5151 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings6.547 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings5.743 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings9.1155 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
156 Ratings
4% below category average
GoTo Webinar
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.0
227 Ratings
0% below category average
Versioning8.1135 Ratings00 Ratings8.4160 Ratings
Video files6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings8.2194 Ratings
Audio files6.896 Ratings00 Ratings8.6193 Ratings
Document collaboration8.3151 Ratings00 Ratings8.7207 Ratings
Access control8.6146 Ratings00 Ratings8.5189 Ratings
Advanced security features8.3113 Ratings00 Ratings8.3149 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings5.353 Ratings
Device sync8.384 Ratings00 Ratings8.4163 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.1
153 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings7.2145 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings7.1141 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.6
170 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
High quality audio00 Ratings8.2170 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings7.6120 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.2
170 Ratings
12% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Calendar integration00 Ratings7.7147 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events00 Ratings8.4165 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows00 Ratings8.5148 Ratings00 Ratings
Event registration00 Ratings8.6161 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
8.2
215 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Audience polling00 Ratings7.9193 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A00 Ratings8.6211 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
7.9
166 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings7.8163 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list00 Ratings8.0143 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
GoTo Webinar
8.1
133 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Branding options00 Ratings8.1129 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation00 Ratings8.0113 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
BigMarker
BigMarker
Score 6.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Zoho Meeting
Zoho Meeting
Score 8.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
ON24
ON24
Score 7.7 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(173 ratings)
7.6
(226 ratings)
8.4
(281 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(21 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
3.7
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(61 ratings)
8.6
(222 ratings)
8.7
(67 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(5 ratings)
7.9
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(25 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
8.3
(113 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(4 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(1 ratings)
5.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(7 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceGoTo WebinarMicrosoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
I would recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies that want to have internal documentation and minimum governance processes to ensure documentation is useful and doesn't have a lot of duplicated and non-updated content. I wouldn't recommend Atlassian Confluence for companies with a low budget since this product might be a little costly (especially with add-ons).
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
It is great for big events like training or product demos. It's good for marketing webinars with features like polls and Q&A. It's not ideal for small, casual meetings. It can be too expensive for some businesses. For smaller events, other tools might be better.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams excels highly in providing seamless communication and collaboration across teams working both on-site and remotely from different locations. Its capabilities for chat, meetings, file sharing, calling, etc., on a single platform meet all collaboration and meeting needs an organization requires. Also, provide complete features of running group calls and conferences.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • We launched a product for a mass and more than 500 people attended the webinar and it was seamless.
  • Recording capability for the later usage
  • Setup is very simple for both admins and end users
  • Polls are helpful in assessing the engagement of the customers
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Makes communication and collaboration easier through Chat.
  • Lets us personalize and humanize face-to-face interactions through Meetings.
  • Helps me effectively plan out my day through Calendar.
  • Enables us to safely store and access our information through OneDrive.
  • Simplifies calls and voice communication.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • Can't schedule recurring webinars twice per week or every other week--must manually add or delete instances.
  • Can't schedule recurring webinars more than 'x' number of instances (less than a year's worth).
  • If you want a recurring webinar to continue past the last instance (in order to keep the same link), your only option is to manually add future instances before the last one occurs. If the last instance occurs, the webinar (and corresponding link) are archived with no recourse and you must recreate it from scratch and update every bit of external collateral with a new link. So I have to have reminders on my calendar every 6 months to go in and add additional dates for all my recurring webinars in order to keep my links active.
  • Canceling/changing seats is a huge pain.
  • The default 'join' screen is app-based rather than web based, so registrants often have to download GTW. I have a lot of clients whose computers are locked down from unapproved apps and have missed the webinar because the ability to join on the web is very unintuitive.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
  • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
  • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
Our largest issue with GoTo have been the limitations on recording and using recordings to host a webinar, and the biggest of those is the ability to record. We have had most of our webinars recorded successfully, but when it failed to save, it failed in a big way. Their customer service team was there to help, but they were unable to truly fix the problem. There are, of course, other providers, but as we are still seeing where hosted webinars fit in our marketing strategy, cost is an important factor. Since our company already uses GoToMeeting, it makes more sense for us to stay with the entire suite of products, especially while we are testing the strategy as a whole.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
Great for organizing knowledge in a hierarchical format. Seamless for engineering and product teams managing software development. Helps in formatting pages effectively, reducing manual work. Tracks changes well and allows for easy rollbacks. Granular controls for who can view/edit pages. Search function is not great which needs improvement. Hire some google engineers
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
This is very easy to set up, configure, onboard, and use. The features can be explored without much ado. In-webinar and post-webinar features are also used seamlessly. Any new person can self-train in minutes and be hands-on. I love the overall usability of this tool.
Read full review
Microsoft
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I rated GoTo Webinar a 9 out of 10 for availability because it generally performs reliably, with minimal application errors or unplanned outages. The platform’s high uptime ensures that it’s usually accessible when needed, supporting a seamless experience for scheduling and conducting webinars. While occasional minor issues may arise, they are infrequent and typically well-managed, contributing to a strong overall rating for availability.
Read full review
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I rated GoTo Webinar an 8 out of 10 for performance due to its generally robust capabilities. Pages load quickly, and reports are generated efficiently, even for complex data sets. The platform’s integration with other systems typically doesn’t introduce significant latency or performance issues. However, during peak usage times or when handling very large data volumes, there can be occasional slowdowns. Despite these instances, GoTo Webinar consistently provides strong performance and reliability in its core functions.
Read full review
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I was always able to get someone on the phone when I needed to. They were very thorough and ensuring my questions were answered. And if I was asking for a solution or request that they didn't offer, they told me so I could at least stop trying to search for it.
Read full review
Microsoft
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I didn't participate in the implementation nor did my company. As far as I know we have an IT office running alla these projects and we just use the final products for our educational purposes. I also didn't notice implementation at any level while using the desktop interface, but would immediately recognize it, if so.
Read full review
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
GoToWebinar has a user-friendly interface and intuitive controls. When comparing it with other platforms, assess how easily you can navigate through features, set up events, and engage with participants. Connection stability, audio and video quality seem pretty much ok. Interactive polls, Q&A sessions, recording options are also working fine and provide to the user experience
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
Scalability
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
I rated GoTo Webinar an 8 out of 10 for scalability because it effectively supports deployment across multiple departments and sites with its flexible features. It allows for easy management of large-scale webinars and integration with various systems, accommodating a growing number of users and sessions. However, some users might find limitations in advanced customization or specific integration needs as their requirements become more complex. Overall, its robust capabilities and adaptability make it a strong choice for scalable webinar solutions.
Read full review
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Professional Services
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • The AI feature which lets me find relevant documents while reading one document is really beneficial.
  • Centralising of knowledge systems is one of the key differentiators for large organisations.
  • As long as folks keep using Google Docs and Atlassian Confluence, there is going to be a challenge in building a continuum.
Read full review
GoTo (formerly LogMeIn)
  • GoTo Webinar has been an excellent way to stay relevant and to get current topics/information to our target audience.
  • We usually get 100-200 attendees per session in a niche market, many are international attendees
  • The ability to get specific data from the audience via custom registration questions allows us to really focus on what they want to see.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has a positive impact on relationships among geographically remote locations. we get to meet and see each other is Realtime seemlessly.
  • We sell a lot more products and services to our partners when we can meet on Teams
  • May organizations have strict travel budgets and Teams allows is to be as close to being there as limited budgets allow.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoTo Webinar Screenshots

Screenshot of Setup flow for a new webinar in GoTo Webinar.Screenshot of Organizer's Control Panel and in-session experience