Avaya UCaaS is a business communications platform. Avaya UCaaS aims to set employees up for success with unified internal communication, supporting voice, chat, email, video, file sharing, and task management. The software enables users to create collaboration in real-time using any device or system through one platform.
N/A
SharePoint
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Microsoft Teams
Score8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Pricing
Avaya Unified Communications
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Avaya Unified Communications
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Free Trial
No
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Avaya Unified Communications
SharePoint
Microsoft Teams
Considered Multiple Products
Avaya
Verified User
Chose Avaya Unified Communications
I Don't see any major difference between Avaya UCaaS and other similar products which includes webex, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet. All of them provide more or less similar functionalities and have all integration. However, Avaya UCaaS is more holistic when compared to …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Network Administrator in Information Technology at Children's Aid Society of Algoma (Mental Health Care, 51-200 employees)
Chose Avaya Unified Communications
SSO was not available for our former Avaya IP Office on-premises system, and after the pandemic, we needed hybrid work, so all workers could work from home and this ushered in the age of cloud for us with Avaya UCaaS: Cloud. It is our choice now only because our workforce is no …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Avaya Unified Communications
Avaya Cloud Office maintains important features that others do not (such as e-faxing). Can easily transfer a call from desktop phone, to mobile app seamlessly. More cost effective than Microsoft Teams once you factor in calling. More feature rich and reliable than Zoom or Webex.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Avaya Unified Communications
I wasn't involved in the testing or selection process, only the implementation
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Staff Project Manager, Awesomizer, Fixer, Maker, Collaboration Enabler in Research & Development at Beckman Coulter, Inc (Biotechnology, 10,001+ employees)
Chose SharePoint
There is no competitor to SharePoint for an organization our size. The integration into our development environment, active directory, and other office tools just can't be matched (specifically from a contractual agreement and holistic perspective with ALL of our toolsets). Micr…
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Web Developer in Information Technology at TCDRS (Investment Management, 51-200 employees)
Chose SharePoint
Atlassian Confluence isn't as robust with document storage but it does provide a good way to share detailed information in article or Wiki format. Microsoft SharePoint is more like a lightweight webpage creation tool while Confluence more like an enhanced notebook. Microsoft …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Data Management Consultant in Information Technology at Shell (Oil & Energy, 10,001+ employees)
Chose SharePoint
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ERP Consultant in Professional Services at Platned Syngco (Information Technology & Services, 51-200 employees)
Chose SharePoint
Since Microsoft SharePoint comes with the MS business office package, it is fully integrated with other office products and really works together with other MS Office products like Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Access, Publisher, etc.. in real-time, so it's really easy to maintain …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Director, Digital Strategy & Engagement in Social Media at Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) (Non-Profit Organization Management, 501-1000 employees)
Chose SharePoint
Slack is not great for document sharing, but it does integrate with SharePoint and One Drive when we need to post links. Slack is better at the chat function though, which is definitely missed from SharePoint.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
Have used Box and MS Team which is add on to MS Sharepoint.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
I have only used Google Drive for personal reasons, not at work. SharePoint has a larger corporation safer feel to it as it uses the comfort of MS Office products for users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
Teams is the new front end for SharePoint. So far, I like the look, feel and adaptability of it better. As for Confluence, I have never been a fan of it's searching capabilities. Additionally, we've encountered users having a hard time being aware of other "spaces" within …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
There are many tools in the collaborative space and SharePoint is a solid choice among them. The deep integration to Microsoft tools and O365 makes it a good choice for any company that is already invested in the Microsoft suites; better than the others in that respect.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Vice President, eCommerce in Information Technology at Bagatelle International (Apparel & Fashion, 51-200 employees)
Chose SharePoint
We found that Google Docs was basically much more user-friendly that MS SharePoint, but was much more consumer-focused (which was a good thing from a usability point of view). However, its features were not robust enough for full business implementation. We all use Outlook and …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
Google Drive is much easier to use although there is some lack of features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PhD Student in Engineering at University of Aveiro (Telecommunications, 501-1000 employees)
Chose SharePoint
There are other tools out there that do a small portion of what SharePoint does, and in some cases, it still makes sense to use some of those, if the requirements are there. For example, the Task list in SharePoint isn't great, but it's also very old. Within Office 365, you …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
It replaced our fileservers. It also replaced our former intranet server. Having SharePoint online means always having the latest version, features, and technologies. Our team that manages it all has to be up-to-date on it, but they do, and so occasionally new features are …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Consultant in Social Media at Deloitte Digital (Management Consulting, 5001-10,000 employees)
Chose SharePoint
We selected MS SharePoint due to our Office 365 subscription and the integration offered. We also use SharePoint due to the ease of updating and collaborating across multiple geographies and the large number of users on the platform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose SharePoint
I personally haven't seen anything else that compares to SharePoint. There are other tools out there that do a small portion of what SharePoint does, and in some cases, it still makes sense to use some of those, if the requirements are there. For example, the Task list in …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is just a nicer front end to SharePoint for file and document management but it also has a good communication network for internal and external parties. It's easy to use on mobile device as well. It also integrates well with Microsoft Power Platform etc, meaning …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
We're required to use Microsoft Teams as I assume we get it free as part of our enterprise MS Office Suite agreement.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Microsoft Teams is much more user friendly and has more features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
People Development and Experience Manager in Human Resources at Total Expert (Computer Software, 201-500 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
I prefer using Slack for text and quick video/audio calls. It is easy and has features like GIFs and other integrations built in. It's a nice one button way to communicate. We use Zoom for our more structured meetings and I use Zoom for my training sessions because I can plug …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
While we mostly use monday.com for our CRM needs, we still use Teams for our communication needs all day every day. We couldn't function as a team without Teams! The chat and meeting setup/scheduling function is so useful and easy to use. We have found that having meetings is …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
User experience is of a higher level and integrates well into Outlook. Using the tool to facilitate user testing with participants outside the company is a breeze too.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Team is one of Microsoft's newest applications. Looking at the evolution of the Office suite, I can only imagine what Team will become with the next updates. It's a product that fills a need and has a lot of possibilities to evolve well. I would put it right in the …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
I would say they’re the same, but Microsoft Teams is a more professional app & used more often in corporate environments. I’d use Microsoft Teams over Hangouts as I’m more accustomed to it now.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IT Architect in Information Technology at Intact Financial Corporation (Insurance, 10,001+ employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
Moving to Microsoft Teams from IBM Sametime chat services provided Intact a great ahead into the productivity and response times for both internal and external customers/brokers. Sametime doesn't have the capability to make voice calls from either a desktop or a mobile app …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Programmer Analyst in Information Technology at TCDRS (Investment Management, 51-200 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
I have mainly used the Microsoft messaging tools so I can only compare between them. Overall, I like Teams better than the older versions such as Skype for Business. They did drop one or two features but I can't even remember what they were now. The ones they added are great …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
we actually use both Webex and Microsoft teams. Internally, we mostly work with Webex, but we have multiple clients with which we need to exchange on a project basis, and they use Teams . Therefore we leverage our business licensing with Microsoft and enabled Teams for our …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams definitely has the upper hand over zoom and GoToMeeting. The fact that it is bundled with M365 is a huge plus not only from a cost perspective but it gives you deep integration with the other office products. This allows seamless file sharing with sharepoint and OneDrive, …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Staff Project Manager, Awesomizer, Fixer, Maker, Collaboration Enabler in Research & Development at Beckman Coulter, Inc (Biotechnology, 10,001+ employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a clear winner for robustness and for integration. It has the entire Office 365 toolkit in its corner and for an enterprise level solution, it doesn't have many peers, at least at that level of comprehensiveness. There are some peers that might compete well …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Public Relations Manager, Florida Region at Comcast (Telecommunications, 10,001+ employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
We previously had Microsoft Sharepoint available to our team but never used it because we didn't find it convenient or user-friendly. We had to spend more time trying to figure out how to best use it, and we essentially gave up. I think that's because Sharepoint is mostly just …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Enterprise System Administrator in Information Technology at KCTCS (Higher Education, 5001-10,000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams is an evolution and shift from Skype for Business. It has many of the same functions and allows for even more features and functionality in that communications based workstream. Teams continue to use SharePoint as the storage and file+content services backend, so this …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Director Technology, Enterprise Business Systems in Information Technology at The Walt Disney Company (Entertainment, 10,001+ employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
I think Teams is ahead of the game. Its tight integration with the Microsoft suite has no rival. Having Azure as the backend provides a secure environment in the cloud with content accessible anytime anywhere. Microsoft is heavily investing in the product and constantly adding …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
I do not use Microsoft Teams if I can avoid it, because I can get the same type of work done in Slack, which has a much more intuitive user interface and is more modern in terms of functionality. I also use Skype for Business more regularly because it uses fewer computer …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
It will eventually be the replacement for Skype for Business. Microsoft has announced the end date for Skype and already new instances of Office 365 below a certain number of users don't even include Skype. Already, all they get is Teams. And it's definitely the winner for …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Accounts Payable Manager in Finance and Accounting at Barton Malow Company (Construction, 1001-5000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
OneNote and SharePoint are powerful collaboration tools that I use heavily. The great thing is Teams incorporates these software packages into one instance. Your team can look at the shared OneNote; they can view and upload files in SharePointe; they can leave general notes in …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a much better, more complete product than either Trello or Skype. We previously used Skype and it was somewhat limited as it was not fully integrated into the Microsft suite of products.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Systems Programmer Analyst in Information Technology at East Carolina University (Higher Education, 5001-10,000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams provide a good feature set that matches the commonly used enterprise collaboration tools from multiple vendors. What the Teams product lacks in VoIP support, it makes for in its web conferencing capabilities. Yammer only has a small set of collaboration …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IT Auditor in Corporate at Unilab, Inc. (Pharmaceuticals, 1001-5000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
The greatest strength MS Teams has against others is that it greatly complements other Microsoft online services. In other platforms, one cannot add or share work files and open them within the interface, so others can see. As other software is focused more on the …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Prior to adopting Teams, our organization used Slack. I think Teams has made big gains in recent years and now offers essentially the same functionality and services has Slack does. While I enjoyed using Slack, I have not seen a drop off in functionality or usability since …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Collaboration Architect in Information Technology at Oportun (Financial Services, 1001-5000 employees)
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams lead them all. Having a large number of teams and channel accesses is great. It is a part of Office 365 license which makes it pretty much free to use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams has more out of the box functionality than Slack, and Teams apps are easier for casual users to get started with. Slack integrations, Webhooks, and bots make Slack a superior messaging platform. But when comparing on the basis of an enterprise collaboration tool, Teams …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
5.9
22 Ratings
35% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
High quality audio
7.922 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
High quality video
6.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
8.3
14 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing
8.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
8.8
17 Ratings
3% above category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Calendar integration
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting initiation
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Record meetings / events
8.113 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
8.5
16 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Live chat
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
7.5
20 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
User authentication
7.519 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
7.519 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
7.8
27 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
8.119 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
6.918 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
8.5
26 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Answering rules
7.624 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
8.320 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
9.421 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
9.420 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
8.423 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business SMS/External Messaging
8.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Fax
8.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Voicemail Transcription
7.820 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
7.7
23 Ratings
14% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
7.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Unified Communications Platform and Collaboration
Comparison of Unified Communications Platform and Collaboration features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
7.9
18 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Centralized communications management
7.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team messaging
7.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team document sharing
8.313 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call and meeting analytics
8.216 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
-
Ratings
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.2
241 Ratings
6% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.1179 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.196 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.3208 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.4126 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2229 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6212 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.4143 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Feature
Avaya Unified Communications
-
Ratings
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Microsoft Teams
8.0
251 Ratings
0% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.0250 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.4249 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.7235 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.2146 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.6157 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.547 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.743 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.1155 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Avaya Unified Communications and Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Teams
Call centers where lots of calls come in per day are better suited for Cloud office. Small businesses or companies that don’t really make outgoing calls or receive a lot of incoming calls other than within the company would not really be suited for Avaya Cloud Office.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's Microsoft, so it rarely goes down or unnecessarily limits access. It works, though page load times can be long if you have lots of data. I feel like the Mac vs. PC divide has started to show up for MS products, but SharePoint works well with both.
It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Windows Explorer users have some difficulty having to constantly UPLOAD / DOWNLOAD files. Specifically on the DOWNLOAD when they are used to Drag & Drop in & out of LOCAL folders via Window's explorer.
Microsoft SharePoint supports multiple "library" types. When implementing our "image" library the search function is done via "tags" and boolean logic. This is challenging to most end users. I'd like our users to be able to search our Microsoft SharePoint image library without having to enter KEYWORD or other BOOLEAN logic.
Microsoft SharePoint can also be an internal website for each department or company wide communication tool but I believe these features are geared for much larger organizations. Since we are a SMB we really aren't using these features. So maybe something more useful to SMBs would be nice.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Things change, business requirements change so when we come to renew we may explore other options, we might go all in on Teams or look at something different - we need something that allows us to increase and importantly decrease our licence count more flexably which Avaya / Ring Central don't allow.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There are few times that we have not been able to take advantage of the tool, but those moments are related to the bandwidth of each person in [their] home. Those who have low signal cannot access meetings on the platform smoothly.
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have never contacted support directly. However, my rep with Enterprise Systems is excellent. Since joining Avaya, all inquiries and/or concerns have always been resolved within a reasonable amount of time. If it's a less complex issue, it is resolved in real time. I receive a response within 30 minutes or less. When he is out of the office, he always has a backup.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Apart from Cisco Webex Calling/app no other vendor offers their own phones hardware, gateways. We need to add other vendors like yealink, Poly, Audiocodes to complete the solution. This makes things very difficult from management perspective. As you have to hire a person who can manage a multivendor environment. Also, in case of outage, multiple bridge open and every vendor blame others. Cisco is costly so we gave a chance to Avaya UCaaS based on its history and reputation in Calling market.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
This made working from home possible, allowing me to take calls that I wouldn't be able to without having them forwarded by our communications department
It works with Teams, realizing when I'm on a conf call and automatically sets a status of away, preventing my phone from ringing, but allowing me to see the voicemail via text so that I can respond
If I step out of the office for a little bit, I can have my calls go directly to my cellphone to make sure I'm still available if needed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info