IBM IMS vs. InterSystems Caché

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM IMS
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM IMS, for Information Management System, is a database and transaction server.N/A
InterSystems Caché
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
InterSystems Cache is a database management system (DBMS) and non-relational database.N/A
Pricing
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.3 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
4.0
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM IMSInterSystems Caché
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
We have built a database of a network of bank branches with all the needs of security and recovery/restart. It requires knowledge of obsolete maintenance languages and perhaps it is too rigid in the schemes.
Read full review
InterSystems
It's definitely great for medical industries that need the vast amounts of features/security/performance, however if you need something simple then this would be too much. There is a learning curve, and if you come from more common database technologies, then there will be a lot of differences to handle. Simple database needs would be better fulfilled elsewhere, but Cache is for when you need to take the next step, whether that be in the volume, complexity, or security of ETL.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Big volume of data and good performance
Read full review
InterSystems
  • Performance
  • Robustness
  • Reliable
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Certainly, not being a DB relational penalizes its use
  • It should be more flexible
  • Open up to more recent languages
Read full review
InterSystems
  • The IDE IntelliSense needs to be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.
Read full review
InterSystems
I've only worked with products that do one thing before, but there's so much that Cache offers versus piecing different services together manually. Not only does the product offer a more robust tool-set, but the support is wonderful and I've never encountered a better vendor in any industry in terms of how well they interact with their customers and care about helping you solve your problems. They want you to grow and to get better.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • The investment made about 20 years ago that has been fully repaid
  • Reliability and security of investments
  • Unfortunately, it is quite outdated and therefore maintenance costs are higher because the skills are not always available.
Read full review
InterSystems
  • Implementation time could be speeded up
  • It is very flexible and attractive
Read full review
ScreenShots

InterSystems Caché Screenshots

Screenshot of The structure of InterSystems Caché Database Engine