Likelihood to Recommend Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points is very well suited for large enterprises and high-density environments. It is not well suited for high ceiling buildings like warehouses and storage places because of low antenna gain. In our main office, it is working very well. For around thirty or so wireless devices this access point works very well and after forty or so wireless devices it starts to suffer.
Read full review Best in small networks & appropriate in industrial areas. AP works fine in any temperature & location (in remote locations office or remote location). Open area wireless connectivity is good with good range. Simple VLAN management and management are good. Backup and restoration is very good. Small home offices using wireless network work awesome.
Read full review Pros They are rock solid in terms of reliability (we rarely have to replace them). They are easily managed from the controller. It's easy to push new settings out, like RF profiles, etc... They are fairly easy to install using the included mounting brackets. They seem to be compatible with pretty much everything, although occasionally we will have roaming issues with Apple devices. Read full review Due to multiple switches in a single network environment, communication issues are common; therefore, productivity is effected. After installing D-Link Wireless, we resolved these kind of issues in our network. One windows solution make management easy via D-Link Wireless. Logs and troubleshooting is now easily handled. Pictorial form help in configuration and users management. Read full review Cons CleanAir - Put this technology into all the APs. GPS Tracker - I can't understand why only the Cisco 1570 has this option as well as larger Cisco 3800 APs. Why can't this be in all APs so they can be easily mapped in Google for positioning and later plotted for the coverage zone. Edwin Sandys Manager Enterprise Systems & Networks Infrastructure
Read full review Hanging issues are common in large scale networks. Even wireless controller is hanged in peak hours. Issues in VLAN configuration and port configurations. Cost is high in front of other brands. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Because until now I haven't had any issues or cases where I needed to create a ticket with Tac from Cisco related to their performance or availability. They have a small size that permits or allows you to install it in each place that you need to mount it, their design is small and appropriate for every kind of office.
Read full review Usability Lately we had less issues. Most probably because we reduced the number of Wireless LAN controllers. So less trouble for upgrades as well. We don't have any access point in stand alone mode. It's something I don't suggest, unless it's just for a small office and not for a larger company with different sites.
Read full review Reliability and Availability This access point does not usually randomly shut off. It can't happen but it's generally due to a power over ethernet failures which would could be considered a user error.
Read full review Performance Performance wise [Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points] are among of the best pieces of technology we have on premise. I don't say that lightly, we have a lot of cool tech. But if you consider how many users are connecting to these day in and day out without a single blip when they're downloading large files, roaming to new AP's or needing a boosted signal at a far end of the range then these are unmatched.
Read full review Support Rating I believe that there is always room for improvement.
Read full review Implementation Rating Make sure to get a professional wireless assessment before purchasing AP's. That way you will only purchase what you need and know where the wiring infrastructure will need to be to streamline the installation and tuning process.
Read full review Alternatives Considered D-Link Wireless network solution was being used previously in [a] few areas of our plant and it was working well with [a] low number of users but as the company grew, and user base started to grow we started seeing hanging, disconnection, and very low-performance issues in our wireless network. We replaced the entire network with Cisco Aironet Access Points and since then the issues have been resolved and [the] wireless network is working with great performance.
Read full review We studied and selected D-Link due to usage in a limited area, and it is a very cost effective solution; therefore, D-Link Wireless AP and D-Link Wireless Controller [were] selected for our organization. We also [researched] Cisco, but Cisco was an expensive product and not appropriate in our required area or task; therefore, we selected D-Link.
Read full review Scalability When it comes to deploying the Cisco Aironet 2800 Series Access Points in locations around the school district it has become easier as you get used to putting 4 screws in the mounting plate to the bracket and then slide the access point onto the bracket.
Read full review Return on Investment There are cost savings in buying a separate WLAN network controller because the 1850 Access Point already has this integrated feature. It allows for remote management and saves time on administration. The return on investment is achieved in a short period of time. Read full review Organizational needs are fulfilled [which] means return on investment. Smooth connectivity increases productivity. Yes, we are satisfied in this area. Management and troubleshooting are core features & very quick in production area. Read full review ScreenShots