The Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) offers a network-based approach for adaptable, trusted access everywhere, based on context. It gives the user intelligent, integrated protection through intent-based policy and compliance solutions.
Aruba ClearPass and Cisco ISE are very similar in nature. The biggest differentiator that I have seen is the Cisco ISE ecosystem around native Adaptive Network Controls, programmable interfaces, pxGrid, and Cisco TrustSec environment. Due to the span of products Cisco has in …
So I also have deployed a system called TPAs by Aruba. It's functionality-wise, it's similar to ISE, and also has its pros and cons, but I'm more towards ISE in this case. And I also use some other systems that are in the same field, for example. But this is not really fully …
We just use Cisco for this kind of purpose, I know the market and the other vendors, other players have a lot of solutions that perform the same action, but for me Cisco is the best one.
So the security team selected Forescout because of its inventory functionality. We have had to utilize Cisco ISE though to actually push the SGT Policies as well as the SGACL mappings and the SXP Propagation across the switch infrastructure. There is a lot more configuration …
Cisco ise is great at what it does. There are much cheaper solutions, but that also comes with it's disadvantages of the support that is usually there. But when you are up against Free Radius....what more is there to say for a lot of the smaller companies that is going to be …
ISE stacks well up against other products in our portfolio with protocols like RADIUS, TACACS and REST APIs. ISE is in many ways good for integration with both other Cisco products (switches, firewalls, WLAN controllers) and products from other vendors. Even with cloud services …
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) Stacks up nicely alongside them and we chose Cisco because our business is a Cisco shop and keeping our number of support vendors low is a big way that we keep things simple resulting in a low headcount in the IT Dept. We use it in …
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) stacks up well against other systems because it does what it says and is stable. For us, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is great for managing access to our network devices and systems. Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) might not do …
We are using a lot of other Cisco solutions, so the integration between them became much better and easier and also gave us a relatively easy way of implementing network automation. We have planned to implement Software define network with the Cisco DNA Center, so Cisco …
In our case, the entire core of our network is based on Cisco technologies as well as user access. For this reason it was the simplest choice given that both by integration and by knowledge of the platform it was the solution with the least complexity and the best adoption …
Cisco ISE is way ahead of other products when it comes to Network Access Control technology. With its granularity level controls and zero trust architecture, we can leverage its extensive policy enforcement to create rules based upon users/processes/machines. It gives so much …
Cisco ISE is very well designed and information is provided in very logical and consistent form in the WebGUI, which cannot be said about Aruba ClearPass or others. Policy design and flow are far clearer than in Aruba ClearPass, Microsoft NPS, or FreeRadius. Cisco ISE …
Meets requirements, this is also easy to use, [easy to] set up, and [provides] quality of support. It [also] provides data protection, network access, security, [and] scaling on wider scope. As mentioned previously it helped on bring-your-own-device (BYOD) setup [and] guest …
I haven't tried any other vendor when it comes to AAA. It seems that ISE was preceded by Cisco ACS. Cisco seems to be the front runner when it comes to this level of security and implementation. Why would you go to another vendor if you know Cisco is the vendor setting the …