Quality by Code Climate vs. CodeStream

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Quality by Code Climate
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Code Climate enables software engineering organizations to achieve excellence across people, process, and code with data-driven insights. Code Climate aligns initiatives with strategic priorities, accelerate software delivery, and drive continuous improvement with the leading Engineering Intelligence Solution. Code Climate provides a 10-point technical debt assessment providing real-time feedback Also, viewing coverage line by line within diffs is provided. In addition, the ability to…
$20
per month per seat
CodeStream
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside an IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on a team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using preferred keybindings and environments. Use a simple shortcut to highlight code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are…
$10
Per Seat / Per Month
Pricing
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Editions & Modules
Quality by Code Climate
$20
per month per seat
Basic
$10.00
Per Seat / Per Month
Enterprise
$49.00
Per Seat / Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.Enterprise tier includes admin console with advanced usage analytics, realtime merge conflict detection, API access, Single sign-on (SSO), premium support and success services
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Quality by Code ClimateCodeStream
Likelihood to Recommend
Code Climate
No answers on this topic
CodeStream
CodeStream is well suited for all developments where two or more people are developing something and I feel there's rarely any project which is been developed and maintained by a single developer. So in short codestream is suitable for almost every development team: - More than one person is developing the code. - People need to get frequent reviews for efficient development. - Best suitable for the teams where new people are there very often. - Collaborations are part of every day to day activities. - Without raising PR and branch management reviews are been incorporated.
Read full review
Pros
Code Climate
No answers on this topic
CodeStream
  • Integration
  • Easy to use.
  • Easy to maintain.
Read full review
Cons
Code Climate
No answers on this topic
CodeStream
  • UI and navigation between services
  • Only support YAML method
  • Manual setting of triggers in the pipeline
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Code Climate
No answers on this topic
CodeStream
When compared to Bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and dedicated and proven support system . Apart from that CodeStream fairs better than AWS CodePipeline in overall features
Read full review
Return on Investment
Code Climate
No answers on this topic
CodeStream
  • Productivity of the team increased.
  • Lowered the chances of mistakes at the time of review.
  • No corners left un-observed.
  • The development cycle becomes more interactive and hence team enjoys the peer discussions and review process.
  • A lot of time is been saved, no need of conventional time taking reviews procedures.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Quality by Code Climate Screenshots

Screenshot of Code Climate

CodeStream Screenshots

Screenshot of Code DiscussionScreenshot of Slack IntegrationScreenshot of Code Review