Compeat, with Ctuit Radar vs. SAP Fieldglass

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Compeat, with Ctuit Radar
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Compeat in Austin, Texas offers their restaurant management platforms which combine inventory planning and forecasting with workforce management and controls. Their platform comes in two editions: Advantage for smaller independent and chain restaurants, and Enterprise for large chains. Compeat now includes Ctuit Radar (acquired 2017) as its core operating system, and the foundation for the Compeat Intelligence, Logbook, Labor, Schedule and Inventory solutions that are part of the platform.
$399
per month
SAP Fieldglass
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A Vendor Management System (VMS) used to find, engage, and manage a global external workforce – including temporary workers, freelancers, contractors, consultants, and service workers.N/A
Pricing
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Editions & Modules
Essential
$399
per month
Professional
$489
per month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Small Businesses
7shifts
7shifts
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Jolt
Jolt
Score 9.5 out of 10
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Score 6.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Score 6.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Likelihood to Recommend
3.0
(5 ratings)
8.7
(39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(25 ratings)
User Testimonials
Compeat, with Ctuit RadarSAP Fieldglass
Likelihood to Recommend
Compeat
Compeat is very well suited for large, sit down dining restaurants and can be too much for smaller scale establishments.
Read full review
SAP
  • Pros : Enterprise-wide visibility to contingent
    worker headcount. Automated
    process improves cycle times, reduces manual processes. It's best for customers who already have SAP Ecosystem. Provides a seamless integration to the Clients backend SAP system. Provides advance notification of solution upgrades, patches, and revisions, especially as it relates to cloud hosted solutions. An environment secured against security violations and threats.
  • Cons : Need a good technical and integration with right skillset. The challenge of having a good clean source of Master data. Invoice processing integration and mapping with ERP/SAP needs more improvement. Needs more improvement on cloud based help from user training point of vie.
Read full review
Pros
Compeat
  • It is a reliable accounting system, I like the fact that all transactions are recorded and not possible to change it after it is posted.
  • Inventory is very useful and you can scan items to help with the counting.
  • DSR are pulled automatically from our POS System
  • Bank Reconciliation is pretty easily be done and the bank extract can be imported into the system, Compeat matches transaction automatically.
Read full review
SAP
  • Contingent labor process, starting from the job posting to final candidate onboarding
  • Supplier and Customer collaboration options in the system
  • Configuration options for customers
  • Management of service delivery and service contract setups
  • Option to establish a true end-to-end process (from source2contract to final payment)
Read full review
Cons
Compeat
  • Reporting Reporting Reporting
  • Customer Service
  • Lack of AUTO IMPORT FEATURE TO ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE
Read full review
SAP
  • The simple display and way you navigate the jobs page is not very intuitive. There could be better information displayed than what is there, and it doesn't always make sense in how you move from one page to another.
  • I really don't like the requirement of the last 5 digits of a candidate's social security number for the "Security ID." Some candidates are reluctant to give that out, when paired with their birth day (also required). I'm not sure why this couldn't be a different piece of information - last 5 of the primary phone number, for example.
  • Some of the field are not well-defined. For example. there is a Resume field, then an Attachments field. And the rate section isn't 100% clear, especially when entering overtime rates or discounted rates.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Compeat
No answers on this topic
SAP
Again, Fieldglass is a strong contender but Fieldglass can be difficult at times to work with and not as supportive as I'd like. As so, I'd be willing to try Beeline or other top competitors
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Compeat
Much better and more willing to "build" a product that works for our company.
Read full review
SAP
Great SAP system to use on multiple project data protection and preparation of clear reports and financial analytics gathering the SAP solution is effective. Through the platform, all our project documents are easy to access and upload, and to manage activities and project assets allocated via the platform are excellent.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Compeat
  • It helps us keep our costs manageable, we can keep our theoretical costs within 1% of our actual costs.
  • Creating shopping lists and par levels makes purchasing less daunting and saves hours in time.
Read full review
SAP
  • Fieldglass has returned significant RoI in terms of reduced rates, reduced number of suppliers and reduced numbers of workers.
  • Fieldglass has simplified and automated the non-employee processes for managers creating more capacity for them to focus on more added value work.
  • Fieldglass has helped reduce the risk and exposure to non-compliant suppliers and spend.
Read full review
ScreenShots