DemandScience vs. D&B Hoovers

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
D&B Hoovers
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
D&B Hoovers delivers sales intelligence data for millions of companies globally.N/A
Pricing
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
D&B Hoovers
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting8.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
D&B Hoovers
8.1
87 Ratings
7% above category average
Advanced search00 Ratings8.183 Ratings
Identification of new leads00 Ratings7.878 Ratings
List quality00 Ratings8.084 Ratings
List upload/download00 Ratings8.577 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting00 Ratings7.875 Ratings
Load time/data access00 Ratings8.383 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
D&B Hoovers
8.0
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Contact information00 Ratings6.978 Ratings
Company information00 Ratings8.785 Ratings
Industry information00 Ratings8.384 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
D&B Hoovers
8.0
83 Ratings
8% above category average
Lead qualification process00 Ratings7.455 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations00 Ratings7.564 Ratings
Salesforce integration00 Ratings8.243 Ratings
Company/business profiles00 Ratings8.677 Ratings
Alerts and reminders00 Ratings7.957 Ratings
Data hygiene00 Ratings7.867 Ratings
Automatic data refresh00 Ratings7.658 Ratings
Tags00 Ratings8.448 Ratings
Filters and segmentation00 Ratings8.565 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
D&B Hoovers
9.2
36 Ratings
20% above category average
Sales email templates00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Append emails to records00 Ratings8.436 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
8.9
(92 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
6.2
(3 ratings)
9.2
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.7
(69 ratings)
8.2
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.2
(3 ratings)
6.3
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceD&B Hoovers
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
I recently was asked by my boss to try to drum up some business with a certain 500 million annual revenue company. When I searched for Contacts, a list of over 800 employees popped up. I was able to filter by department, and this pared the list down To a much more manageable 15 names with associated contact information. I was then able to sort further and select the names of all the employees that had an email or phone number listed.
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
  • allows you to search within broad industry categories or very detailed subcategories using a variety of methods (NAICS, SIC, D&B's internal coding system, keywords, etc.)
  • Has a variety of personnel that you can view and sort by level, name, or email availability.
  • Oftentimes emails for C-level personnel cannot be located on the company website or easily found elsewhere online.
Read full review
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
  • We should be able to "exclude" words from titles or company names
  • Able to access titles and email addresses more easily - not look at list first, select find matching contacts button, then go back to sort to add titles contain and email addresses, etc. This is a two-step process to get what I need.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
We have been D&B Hoovers customers for a long time. We know the good and bad, and we have learned to utilize D&B Hoovers for the good and unfortunately we have to look at other data sources to compensate for the areas where they are bad. If D&B Hoovers can get better in these other areas as mentioned in other places in the review, they could get a larger dollar spend from my company
Read full review
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
Whenever I had to use D&B hoovers, I never had a hard time with getting what I need. Additionally, when I show the tool to others, they tend to understand the platform quite quickly. The tool itself is very good and straightforward when I use it to help me put analyses together.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
DemandScience
No answers on this topic
Dun & Bradstreet
Always available on desktop or mobile.
Read full review
Performance
DemandScience
No answers on this topic
Dun & Bradstreet
Meets our needs
Read full review
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
They are terrific at giving instruction/webinars. I am able to call, directly, to an individual and talk to that person. I'm not talking to a robot. They give personal service which is really special.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
for our use case, the implementation was minimal and we did not need a lot of help. The D&B Hoovers platform is pretty intuitive and our account manager was ready for any questions that came up when we use the D&B Hoovers platform
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
The company information provided by D & B hoovers is extremely in-depth and in detail, the accuracy of the information provided gives a very good idea about the prospective company and helps in making cohorts and evaluation fit. As compared to other companies D & B hoovers is not as efficient in detecting buyer intent which other tools like Slintel are very good at. D & B Hoovers gives amazing company info however it can improve on sharing information about buyer intent. Sales Navigator by far provides extremely accurate information with is almost 100% accurate. However, Navigator does not provide buyer intent information.
Read full review
Scalability
DemandScience
No answers on this topic
Dun & Bradstreet
We're a small company with few users, so scalability has not been an issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
Dun & Bradstreet
  • Honestly cannot say we really drove any new sales using D&B Hoovers to prospect new companies and leads. We obtained higher data quality with other tools like ZoomInfo and Skrapp.
  • A year long contract that isn't honored on their side due to lack of customer service and poor data quality definitely does not equal ROI.
  • Spent significant time sanitizing and cleansing inaccurate data provided by their service. Since time is money in business, that was a loss in that aspect.
Read full review
ScreenShots

D&B Hoovers Screenshots

Screenshot of D&B Hoovers dashboardScreenshot of D&B Hoovers company profileScreenshot of D&B Hoovers contact resultsScreenshot of D&B Hoovers Visitor Intelligence