Submittable

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Submittable offers tools to launch, measure, and grow social impact programs, locally and globally. From grants and scholarships to awards and CSR programs, Submittable partners with users to make a difference. The vendor states Submittable has supported over 95,000 social impact programs, receiving nearly 20 million applications, and that teams save an average of 12 hours per week and launch in an average of 14 days.
$10,000
per year
Pricing
Submittable
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Submittable
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Submittable
Considered Both Products
Submittable
Chose Submittable
Submittable isn't in the same league as these other platforms. It's trying to get there but it's been a rocky road. Neither customer support nor the account people we've dealt with at Submittable seem particularly knowledgeable about how the product actually works for …
Chose Submittable
Our company chose Submittable before I was hired and it is now a legacy system
Chose Submittable
I used Call for Entry before and think it works very well, in a comparable way, and is much, much less expensive.
Chose Submittable
Submittable offers a better UX/UI and a more manageable pricing model
Chose Submittable
I selected Submittable because I had used it in the past as an applicant for a different program, and I found it easy to use from that perspective. I met with other companies and did a comparative analysis and Submittable was the most user friendly and also the most affordable …
Chose Submittable
Many features on the LGL forms do not translate to Submittable and vice versa. We use Submittable more because it allows for better branching and flexibility to customize each form rather than needing multiple for the same data collection or selection process. While we like LGL …
Chose Submittable
Submittable's customer service was more helpful than other platforms we considered using.
Chose Submittable
I can't think of other services I've reviewed in-depth like Submittable. We like Submittable. We're consistently happy with the results and have felt no need to explore alternative options especially with so many of our users being already familiar with the interface. We've …
Chose Submittable
As a user seeking a seamless form creation experience, I can confidently say that Submittable exceeds all expectations with its diverse range of options and efficient backend processes. From the moment I started using it, I was impressed by the abundance of features and the …
Chose Submittable
When it comes to collecting applications, no one beats Submittable in terms of features and functionality. With other software we used, there were far too many limitations, including having to manually download data, inability to use logic for fields, and no analytics. The …
Chose Submittable
Submittable vs Google Forms is a no-brainer. Yes, you have to make a profile for Submittable, but it takes only a few minutes. Google Forms doesn't have an intuitive or easy way to sort applications or provide a review process. With Submittable, we can track multiple projects …
Chose Submittable
Honestly, I haven't used other comparable products to Submittable. That said, the interface is far better than the submission managers for so many other literary magazines. It feels far cleaner and far more professional.
Chose Submittable
I haven't used any other competing products.
Chose Submittable
There was no good way for us to keep blog publiscations within our microsot suit so we moved onto Submittable.
Chose Submittable
Submittable has so many functionalities which helps me when I need to ask applicants very specific questions or branch applicants off into differing categories. It is simple yet thorough.
Chose Submittable
There is no contest. Google Forms is easy and free, but has severely limited customization options, and 0 review process. I love how I have everything in one platform with Submittable.
Chose Submittable
The Google suite of services is essentially free, but it is not designed specifically for applicants, reviewers and awardees. However, it is very intuitive and user friendly. We have been able to make both services work for us and meet our particular needs. Google saves money, …
Chose Submittable
We have used Google Drive for tracking applications in the past. This was useful, and free, but not specifically designed for this service. Sometimes we think of switching back to Google Drive, simply to save on costs. However, for now, we are staying with Submittable. This is …
Chose Submittable
OpenWater, in my opinion, was a better fit for our company when considering the holistic needs of each team and the dozens of programs we manage. Ultimately, Submittable was selected for various reasons that didn't all play out as expected, and I think the organization would …
Chose Submittable
We ultimately selected Submittable because of its ease-of-use, and how willing they were to accommodate our "special situations" without charging us a la carte for additional functionality. The others were several thousand dollars more annually, with LESS functionality and …
Chose Submittable
Submittable is definitely more agile to adapt to your needs, and it has more parameters to choose from. On the other side, our current size of the grants is limited, so I don't know if Submittable can efficiently scale up.
Chose Submittable
Blackbaud Grantmaking was more complicated/difficult to use but had more features that enabled project & relationship management. It was also more integrated with our financial management system.
Chose Submittable
I've also just used a system called Slideroom for a jury process through another grants organization.
Chose Submittable
We used SlideRoom for ease of development and quick turnaround time. We didn't have much time to launch the program, so we went with something that was familiar to many.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Submittable
Small Businesses
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Workday Financial Management
Workday Financial Management
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Submittable
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(74 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(5 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(70 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(4 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(3 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Submittable
Likelihood to Recommend
Submittable
Good if you are just getting started with online application forms for grants. Not so good if you have more advanced needs for data reporting. Also not great to be a fairly long term customer who can't take advantage of recent changes, because they provide no automatic or even manual way to link older submissions to the new grantee profiles based on an applicant's UEI/EIN.
Read full review
Pros
Submittable
  • Great customer service.
  • Reviewers are able to see all documents on one screen instead of opening multiple windows in order to review the application.
  • Applications are easy to build and edit.
  • The review portions is user friendly.
  • Applicants find the forms easy to use.
Read full review
Cons
Submittable
  • It really is just a submission aggregator and does not make the grants/project management very efficient for program managers.
  • Our organization uses our grant application process to deepen our local nonprofit relationships and needs to be able to view & manage nonprofit profiles, not just submissions.
  • Need more options for DocuSign fields beside the placeholder tags that are currently available, such as custom fields we've created within a specific form.
  • Need functionality for nonprofits that use fiscal agents -- this is why we cannot use the charity check feature to organize our submissions by organization name.
  • Pulling reports for reviewer scores is not feasible with the current setup -- we have an agreement with Submittable to pull our scores in a specific format that we are unable to do within the system ourselves. This eliminates some level of efficiency we thought we would have.
  • Pulling immediate information from reports is not feasible -- there's a delay of approximately two days for submission information to populate into the advanced report. This creates some manual work for me to be able to process same-day payments for the emergency assistance program.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Submittable
We use this software annually to help with our grant processes. Without it, I'd be so lost! Our team relies on the data from our past years to sift applications and we try to prioritize those who have applied and been a finalist but perhaps didn't win in years prior
Read full review
Usability
Submittable
Submittable is very user friendly. Even our less tech-savvy team members were able to navigate Submittable and achieve what was necessary. The single limitation is that it is not easy to move information/documents/applications from the Submittable platform into other platforms, or even to download documents from Submittable into a separate storage system
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Submittable
We have thankfully never experienced an outage nor been affected by a technology issue on Submittable's side that has delayed our grant process. We have instead been able to distribute over $6M in donated dollars to AAPI small business owners because Submittable is trustworthy and available
Read full review
Performance
Submittable
We've had a quick and efficient submittable experience that has always been easy to use. When we need a report it downloads within seconds, even the larger reports are 30 seconds or less to download. Pages are quick to load and reports complete in a more than reasonable time frame
Read full review
Support Rating
Submittable
I think that they are good at answering our questions and solving our problems. We occasionally get reports from applicants about problems the Submittable team has not solved, but I do not know what the applicant has done to get the problem solved.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Submittable
We did not receive in-person training technically, it was virtual but it was one on one with a specialist. They were very patient and skilled - she knew everything about the program and honed in on features that would help make our jobs easier. We are so grateful for the training!
Read full review
Online Training
Submittable
10/10 because we were able to meet virtually and still get all of our questions answered! Online was effective too because we could easily record the sessions and review them later. Since we had to onboard our reviewers virtually, it was actually convenient that this was the same method we learned how to use the entire program virtually too.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Submittable
I would say, provide Submittable as much detailed information on your planned use of the platform and your desires with the platform as possible, and the implementation will be tailored to accommodate your organization with minimal lag time and issues/problems.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Submittable
When it comes to collecting applications, no one beats Submittable in terms of features and functionality. With other software we used, there were far too many limitations, including having to manually download data, inability to use logic for fields, and no analytics. The other products we used for application collection could not compare to Submittable.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Submittable
Pricing is fair for the product and support received, and we are content with the billing being annual in order to save overall. Contract terms are fair, and don't seem inflated for any reason. Pricing per application is also fair, and you can actually have the applicant absorb the cost if necessary
Read full review
Scalability
Submittable
We were happy to use this for many projects, but sometimes it can be hard to filter for a specific applicant and see how many of our projects and grants they have applied to without filtering by project. We're also hoping to have the feature added where reviewers can only see one project at a time if they don't have clearance to view all of the projects
Read full review
Return on Investment
Submittable
  • Ease of training new employees with the system, simple interface and similar to other CRMs, etc.
  • We can launch a new grant fairly quickly now that we have the processes down and templates created
  • Ability to respond quickly to provider questions/needs
Read full review
ScreenShots