Planview ProjectPlace

Notion is an open book that allows you to create whatever you want... nice but having some bumpers makes creating and implementing a solution a bit easier. ProjectPlace is simple to get started and use. You might miss out on a cool feature or two, but I think the lack of a barrier to start working makes it way better for most companies over notion.

Jira and Trello are connecting and both have things that are good and bad. Trello is most like ProjectPlace, in my experience. Since ProjectPlace can be connected to portfolios it greatly exceeds the capabilities of these two.

Microsoft products are great because they are so interconnected. At my company we use most of the microsoft suite, but the dark side of having so many tools that are all so open is that everyone will do their work and documenting their own way. It making attempting to govern your group next to impossible, and it creates a huge learning curve for anyone joining your team. Out ProjectPlace and Portfolios applications are connect to Power BI, SharePoint, and Outlook so we get the best of both worlds.

We utilize all of these products for different use cases.

We use Projectplace because it is connected to Planview Portfolios. The functionalities within ProjectPlace enable collaboration with different teams.

Both Planview Project Place and Planview PPM Pro have their own strengths. We use both; PPMPro is our portfolio tool, while Project Place is a project delivery application.

Planview ProjectPlace has worked globally for our Company. We are many teams across the globe. Utilizing Project Place keeps everyone on task no matter where they are in the world. We selected ProjectPlace because of it's ease of use and functionality. To be able to see in detail where each project is and what needs to be accomplished is valuable for our entire organization.

Organization went with ProjectPlace so we followed suit.

Part of the enterprise solution.

on par

Once everyone was trained it was easy to keep the info updated

Using with PPM Pro had more reporting features

It's better in some ways, not as good in others. I like it's ability to connect multiple workspaces together for a Team.

We use both and integrate the two.

Reporting and Portfolio Management won out for ProjectPlace.

It offers a simpler alternative that's easier to manage by the less tech-savvy people. I also think that Planview Projectplace has managed to keep the product updated compared to other project management tools. Miro is perhaps the one that comes to mind, but while evaluating, we saw fewer issues with Planview Projectplace. Overall, the decision came down to the project manager, that had previous experience and recommended the product.

For me, using a product from a smaller company is better because I know that there will be a focus on improving it, unlike, for example, Microsoft products that can be discontinued at any moment.

I like both Trello and Planview Projectplace. I think that Planview Projectplace lends itself to being used for larger companies and more in-depth tasks. I like Trello more really because of its ease of use and user interface.

The ease of access and configuration helped us to go with Planview Projectplace.

Projectplace has many similar features in terms of conversations, document storage, and timesheet tracking. However, I think where it offers improved performance is in use of Kanban boards to promote more agile project environments over a waterfall type environment. I also enjoy the analytics of Projectplace where I can generate specific boards as overview charts, project overview stats, etc.

I think it is fine but has been a much more difficult integration that originally anticipated.

Not sure yet, but they use Kanban and cards and track tasks back to Planview Enterprise One.

I have only used Excel, Outlook Tasks and Notes. No other similar products.

Most of these others don't have many of the features that are available in Planview Projectplace. The agile methodology is in a true sense covered by Planview Projectplace, not by Asana nor Wrike. In Confluence, one has to link up with Jira for full functionality, but in Projectplace that is not the case. We can also integrate other software with Planview Projectplace and they work well with it, but that is not so with the above-mentioned tools.

There are not really any other products that we have tried out because this one works for us and our team, but I am not sure if other teammates have.

[In my experience] Jira is more refined, better looking, and easier to become familiar with. Also, the massive market share of Jira helps in consultancy as you can switch between clients easily. Projectplace has many powerful tools but so does Jira, and Jira integrates with our suite of software much easier compared to Projectplace.