Overall Satisfaction with ArcGIS
ArcGIS is used by our organization to accomplish many geographic modeling tasks. The tasks include geocoding, building interactive web maps, creating analytical models to answer business questions, and for other advanced geographic analyses. The software is used across the organization by IT professionals as well as professional analysts with the technical know-how to address geographic questions.
- ArcGIS is world-class with geographic analyses.
- ArcGIS works well with web applications.
- ArcGIS takes forever to open, and it seems to be getting slower with every new release.
- The creators of the ArcGIS software make it more difficult to create add-ins for the product than what could be done with an open-source solution.
- ArcGIS has had a positive ROI in that it has made possible many new products.
- ArcGIS has been a negative ROI for analysts not willing to put in the time or effort to make use of the software's most advanced capabilities.
- Tableau Desktop, AutoCAD, Mapbox, CARTO (formerly CartoDB) and Salesforce Maps (formerly MapAnything)
These alternatives to ArcGIS have one thing in common - they are all generally more user-friendly, and they all lack the capability of ArcGIS. ArcGIS can do most anything geographically-related, while these other products do one or two things very well. For instance, ArcGIS's web interface is often used but is in no way the most aesthetically pleasing.
Do you think ArcGIS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ArcGIS's feature set?
Yes
Did ArcGIS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ArcGIS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ArcGIS again?
Yes