Cisco Catalyst Switches Continue to Mature With 9k Series
June 16, 2022
Cisco Catalyst Switches Continue to Mature With 9k Series

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Catalyst Switches
- Catalyst 2960 X/XR Series
- Catalyst 3560-CX Series
- Catalyst 3650 Series
- Catalyst 3850 Series
- Catalyst 9200 Series
- Catalyst 9300 Series
- Catalyst 9400 Series
- Catalyst 9500 Series
The "older" Catalyst Switches (pre-9k) were all pizza box style for access, mostly Layer 2. The higher-end 3850s could even be used for server access on small "raised floors." The newer 9k Catalyst switches are our current standard for Access Layer, but the 9300s are sometimes Layer 2 and sometimes Layer 3, whereas the 9400 chassis are always Layer 3 and the 9500s are used for Distribution/Core at facilities.
Pros
- Throughput (per port, backplane, uplink, etc)
- Stacking (9300s)
- SDA (Integrate with DNA for segmentation, PnP, etc)
- Hosting (Hard drives can host Docker and apps)
- Monitoring/Telemetry (and ThousandEyes)
Cons
- Cost
- Lead times/Supply chain
- Long-life relevance (we have many switches still running years past EOL)
Depending on the model of Cisco Catalyst Switch, there are many different levels of customization and feature sets. And, once passing into the current 9k family, there is a lot of interoperability through DNA, ISE, SD-WAN, and more that are of great benefit to larger corporations. We are still at the beginning stages of these newer features, but the main benefit we're receiving right now is the availability and flexibility.
Do you think Cisco Catalyst Switches delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst Switches's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst Switches live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst Switches go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst Switches again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation