Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX
We use the Cisco Meraki MX for location coupling via SD-WAN and the connection to our cloud. The Cisco Meraki MX can be seen as a rudimentary firewall with basic functions. We also use the Cisco Meraki MX for AMP and IDS/IPS. Client VPN connections are terminated at the main location (Secure access).
- Client VPN
- SD Wan Connections
- IDS/IPS
- The firewall's livelog is missing
- IDS / IPS Livelog (detail) is missing
- Inside NAT (Source NAT)
- IDP and IPS functions can only be configured in a rudimentary manner
- Simple integration of the SD makes site networking easier
- Logging and connection table is not useful
The firewall rules can be easily rolled out using templates. With a large set of rules, you quickly lose track of things; that's something that needs to be worked on. The security center provides rather less information; this is not enough to keep the operation running.
Simple implementation with a high benefit factor, locations can be easily integrated worldwide.
We are currently testing Cisco Secure Access, the result is still pending.
Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?
Yes