Overall Satisfaction with CoderPad
As an end user. CoderPad is utilized by interviewers to host technical coding interviews. Generally it works quite well and gives users an environment to code in various languages.
- Large range of supported languages
- Code runs quickly
- Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
- Occasionally IDE parsing of code will mark correct code incorrect and will update late
- Listing functions callable by a given object is sometimes slow
- Could provide a small non-login required demo site for interviewees so they will be more used to the development environment before interviews
- Live code editing between multiple people
- Built in drawing tool to give coders a way to plan out code/ideas
- Ability to provide take-home projects
- Simplifies interview process and helps field candidates better by seeing how they function in a coding environment
- HackerRank and CodeSignal
There are some aspects of HackerRank and CodeSignal that I think CoderPad should consider. This is quite subjective, but coding in HackerRank or CodeSignal just feels much better and I have less issues with bracket creation/alignment in languages such as Java/C++. The coding environment in these other products also do an overall better job of parsing and highlighting. CoderPad is more interactive though, and is the product for live interviews
Do you think CoderPad delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with CoderPad's feature set?
Yes
Did CoderPad live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of CoderPad go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy CoderPad again?
No
Using CoderPad
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Interview Hosting
- Coding
- Inviting People
- Voice and video is not as nice in a browser