Overall Satisfaction with Conductor
As we've evolved as a company, our SEO has gone from basic SEO functions (keyword research, blog outlines, etc.) to more of an enterprise-level approach (meta-tag analysis, sitewide audits, core web vitals, etc.). With this shift, we found that our previous SEO tools (SEMRush, Ahrefs) no longer fit the bill completely.
- Enterprise-level SEO
- Core Web Vitals Analysis
- Site Audits
- Keyword research accuracy
- Usability
- Sitemap Analysis
- Improved page speed
- Identified keyword gaps
- Helped resolve errors
We haven't taken very good advantage of the integrations that Conductor offers. Quite frankly, we're just not seeing the ROI of integrating it beyond Google Analytics, and Google Search Console.
Because it's a fairly straightforward tool, we're easily able to bring copywriters under the Conductor roof and get them trained up on it, reducing the burden on our in-house SEO team.
Conductor is a pretty far-reaching tool that covers most SEO pillars pretty well. While it offers little "net new" functionality in the sense of doing things that we can't do for ourselves, it does offload quite a bit of work and manual labor for our team. Site audits, for example, are pretty easy with Conductor.
We moved to Conductor because the functionality matched what we were looking for. Price was not as much of a factor, thankfully, because Conductor is expensive.
Do you think Conductor delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Conductor's feature set?
Yes
Did Conductor live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Conductor go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Conductor again?
No