Overall Satisfaction with Google Cloud SQL
I am working on a e-commerce website and has to use 2 databases one for transactions for this I used Google Cloud SQL and other I use nosql db.The Google Cloud SQL is easy to setup it is basically a plug and play kind of system.Earlier I am using aws rds has to shift to Google Cloud SQL and used google data migration service for this.
- easy setup and monitoring
- easy migration with network connectivity
- easy export and import of data
- Google Cloud SQL's performance might not always match that of a dedicated, self-managed database server, especially in scenarios with high throughput or complex queries.
- Cost also needs to be reduced currently it is little expensive
- Has to add more support of databases.While Google Cloud SQL supports popular database engines like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server, it may not support other specialized databases for eg Oracle
- It reduced cost as compared to Amazon RDS
- cost of setting up is easier. It also reduces effort of team migrating data
- The monitoring service is good easy to debug complex queries reducing time to solve critical issues
- Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)
Setting up or migrating Google Cloud SQL is easy as compared to AWS. It has a good monitoring and logging mechanism and a good user interface which makes it easy to navigate.It also has a pay as you go pricing which makes it easier to reduce cost. Google Cloud SQL offers features like automatic backups, replication, point-in-time recovery, and automated failover for high availability which makes it a robust architecture
Do you think Google Cloud SQL delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google Cloud SQL's feature set?
Yes
Did Google Cloud SQL live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Google Cloud SQL go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google Cloud SQL again?
Yes