Hyper-V gets the job done while being included in the cost of Windows Server.
Overall Satisfaction with Hyper-V
Hyper-V is used across the whole organization. It solves the problem of agility, not having to purchase a physical for every function needed, saves money, allows for maintenance during business hours, etc.
Pros
- Hypervisor
- Populating with virtual machines
- Redundancy and replication
Cons
- Not so difficult to setup outside the normal usage
- Storage spaces direct is quite difficult to understand and setup
- Centralized dashboard
- Lessened Server Sprawl
- Made things simpler
- More agility
- Saved power and battery
- Citrix Hypervisor (formerly XenServer) and VMware ESXi
You already have to purchase the licensing for Windows Servers so why not bundle that in with the cost of the hypervisor. VMware seems to be a better virtualization platform with a better dashboard, but if you aren't managing hundreds of physical servers across multiple data centers, then Hyper-v should work really well. Citrix seems to be getting out of the server virtualziation market from what I can see.
Do you think Hyper-V delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Hyper-V's feature set?
Yes
Did Hyper-V live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Hyper-V go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Hyper-V again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation