Alkami vs. Oracle FLEXCUBE

If you are looking for a high-quality online banking product and you don’t want/need to customize it too much, Alkami is a great choice- it has a lot out of the box and the people are great. If you need a lot of customization, and you don’t have the internal resources to help you do that, Alkami may be a challenge to satisfy your needs.

Incentivized

The system is very user-friendly and provides help in performing UAT and making the processes live, payment method opt without interacting with humans. Automation of the processes is marvelous.

Incentivized

• Mobile-first design is great on both iOS and Android.
• Broad array of retail banking capabilities.
• A large array of integrated partner products to enhance the core functionality of the base product.
• SDK and API-centric architecture are helping to design for the future of banking applications.

Incentivized

• Scalability
• Multi Lingual
• The modules covers all areas of banking
• Integration with other solutions

Incentivized

• SDK and APIs are not fully mature - while they are functional and have a bright future, the support infrastructure is not fully developed.
• Custom development can take a long time.
• They may be focused on sales over support given their recent public offering.

Incentivized

• Improve workflow for frontline user
• Established own implementation resource rather than use a partner
• It would be good if Oracle maintained a local support office in Cambodia

Incentivized

Support is very expensive and not always up to speed with the market and the latest developments. The support is highly fragmented as well and split among 2-3 Oracle departments.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• Enabled a solid mobile first.
• Ember experience.
• Allowed flexibility via the SDK.
• Allowed us to focus on the business needs over the technology infrastructure.

Incentivized

• Wholesale banking for cash trade.
• Payments of cash.
• Treasury and lending.

Incentivized