Aptean Made2Manage ERP is an enterprise resource planning software solution. It is built specifically for small and mid-sized manufacturers. It includes dynamic, to-order environments such as make-to-order, engineer-to-order, assemble-to-order, and mixed mode operations.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
Infor VISUAL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.0
2 Ratings
153% below category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
1.02 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.5
4 Ratings
83% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Single sign-on capability
5.03 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
2.04 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.7
4 Ratings
95% below category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Dashboards
2.04 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standard reports
3.04 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Custom reports
3.04 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
4.9
5 Ratings
45% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
6.05 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.05 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
5.02 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
5.03 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
5.03 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.03 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.03 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
4 Ratings
126% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Inventory tracking
1.04 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Location management
2.03 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
5 Ratings
93% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Pricing
4.05 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order entry
4.04 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Credit card processing
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
4.04 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
2.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
5.3
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Billing Management
6.03 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
5.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
5.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Period Close
7.02 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.3
2 Ratings
79% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
3.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
3.02 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
3.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
3.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
1.8
1 Ratings
119% below category average
Infor VISUAL
3.0
1 Ratings
81% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.3
1 Ratings
106% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.9
2 Ratings
84% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
1 Ratings
89% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
3.4
2 Ratings
69% below category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
3.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.6
2 Ratings
97% below category average
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Production Process Design
2.01 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Production Management
4.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
2.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Work Execution
3.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.02 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Aptean Made2Manage ERP
2.0
3 Ratings
114% below category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Forecasting
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
2.03 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Aptean Made2Manage ERP and Infor VISUAL
For parts sales, M2M is not a good program. There are too many glitches that happen between the sales order process and the shipping process. At the same time, we have to work with outside vendors to make certain functions work in the program. Or it has to work outside the program and communicate back to the main software. Way too clunky.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am not in the decision making group any more for this product. When I was, I along with many other managers, voted to go with a competitive product software vs re-subscribing to Aptean for this product. We were convinced by certain parties at our work that the new product was head and shoulders above the old product. While they freshened up a few things and there was an increase in some functionality areas, it was still tired.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
This software is not user-friendly nor easy to train on. I train people for various departments and had argued for the company to go with another company. I was not alone. When the time came for us to do an upgrade (necessitated by the advent of Windows 10 compatibility issues), a number of managers at our organization wanted to seek out other vendors due to the difficulty in training people to use the software. Then have to deal with so many of the user issues and lack of functionality created by the need for using an outside software programmer to bring in software that interpreted what M2M was doing and then translate it back into the program so that we had an end-user solution. This software should be robust enough to do it all. It is not. I hate to be so negative about it but anyone that has spent as many years using this software as I have should find something good to say about the platform and I struggle to do that. I had asked for the warranty section that would tie into the return authorization process. I was told it would happen. It didn't. Bad karma.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I go back to the warranty segment of the program to help track expenses that were generated by returns and zero-dollar sales orders to resolve customer issues. I feel like I was lied to by the company. They said they would have it in there on the new release. They told the purchasing manager it would be on the new release. The purchasing manager assured me it would be on there. They even showed 'warranty loading' on the screen when you signed in. However, there was no additional component of the return material authorization process for warranty adaptation. I even challenged our upload team about it and they had no answer. It does a few functions well but in my personal experience, buy something else.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The actual implementation was no worse or better than other software updates. There were days of pain and additional training helped overcome a lot of the learning curve associated with that. However, that training came from our own internal staff vs anyone from Aptean.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I came on board after M2M was implemented so I'm not sure how it has changed from previous software. However, I do know it has the ability to grow with the company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info