What users are saying about
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8 out of 100
Based on 3 reviews and ratings
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 7.9 out of 100
Based on 7 reviews and ratings
Attribute Ratings
- WorkForce Suite is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
75%
2 Ratings

8.0
WorkForce Suite
80%
5 Ratings
Likelihood to Renew
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
N/A
0 Ratings

8.7
WorkForce Suite
87%
4 Ratings
Support Rating
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
N/A
0 Ratings

10.0
WorkForce Suite
100%
2 Ratings
Online Training
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
N/A
0 Ratings

3.0
WorkForce Suite
30%
1 Rating
Likelihood to Recommend
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
ATOSS is well suited for companies working with different work patterns and on different sites. It is also possible to block the changes for the past, which is really useful if payroll is centralized. The interfaces work with multiple systems as well. But in order to avoid having a huge database, it has to be carefully cleaned from time to time by a system admin, especially if you give access to multiple persons.

Verified User
Employee in Human Resources
Airlines/Aviation Company, 1001-5000 employeesWorkForce Suite
EmpCenter is really well suited for companies with minimal variety in time keeping needs. Certainly somewhere that has fairly regular work schedules and operational needs the system would be programmed for and meet those needs quite well. I think they assert themselves as a product specifically for those more complex companies, and I believe it is one of a few products available for companies with many employee types and complex work schedule and pay needs, but because of those complexities each have their own specific customizations I feel it is difficult for the company to then manage the different products that end up existing. Each ends up being unique so applying large scale changes doesn't work well as something we may request and need if applied over EmpCenter in general may cause problems for another company. Therefore everything has to be done on an individual basis and is more time consuming and costly.
Auxiliaries and Activities Business Center Payroll Coordinator
Oregon State UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees
Pros
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
- Flexibility on the configuration
- Security role access management

Verified User
Project Manager in Human Resources
Airlines/Aviation Company, 1001-5000 employeesWorkForce Suite
- A lot flexibility in configuration of the system
- works well with other systems. We were able to collect data from another time system, Avaya phone systems and even a point of sale system with not a lot of difficulty.
- They know their product and integration points. They were able to troubleshoot problems with hardware time collection devices quite quickly. We found the devices they sold to be quite durable.
- Out of the box they have more reports than I would have anticipated. Creating new reports was sometimes a task if it was complex but there were usually similar reports you could use as a starter template
Sr Systems Analyst
Identity Theft 911Insurance, 51-200 employees
Cons
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
- Reports are not so easy to use.
- No document upload.
- Some specific balances needed for our business are not easy to manage.

Verified User
Employee in Human Resources
Airlines/Aviation Company, 1001-5000 employeesWorkForce Suite
- One feature I would like to see on EmpCenter is a vacation calendar that monitors all vacation requests for all employees within a group.
- EmpCenter is not wholly compatible with other softwares and there are occasions when time data does not properly translate.
- Moreover, I would like EmpCenter to automatically provide timekeepers with delegations from managers. This way if a manger does not want to grant the timekeeper authority it is easier to rescind, rather than tracking down all managers to grant timekeeping privileges.
Department Administrator
Baker HughesOil & Energy, 10,001+ employees
Pricing Details
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—WorkForce Suite
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—Likelihood to Renew
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
WorkForce Suite
WorkForce Suite 8.7
Based on 4 answers
After spending close to 5 years to decide on which payroll product to acquire for our University, I cannot image we would switch now that we have it in use.

Verified User
Analyst in Human Resources
Higher Education Company, 1001-5000 employeesSupport Rating
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
WorkForce Suite
WorkForce Suite 10.0
Based on 2 answers
Extremely knowledgeable staff that truly care about our business processes
Sr Systems Analyst
Identity Theft 911Insurance, 51-200 employees
Alternatives Considered
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
This tool is suited for any airline company and based on a market benchmark done in 2009, we selected it as it was the only software that meets our requirements.

Verified User
Project Manager in Human Resources
Airlines/Aviation Company, 1001-5000 employeesWorkForce Suite
Deputy was a LOT easier to use, and I personally liked it more. It did not make approving payroll at the end of the week as easy as WorkForce, and Deputy did not show any PTO balances. Deputy seemed like a simpler, less in-depth version of WorkForce. Personally, I would prefer Deputy, but a lot of my colleagues disagree

Verified User
Manager in Sales
Retail Company, 5001-10,000 employeesReturn on Investment
ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite
- Less paper/Excel sheets: everything is centralized in the system
- Time saving
- Better communication: information is accessible faster and everywhere for the employees

Verified User
Employee in Human Resources
Airlines/Aviation Company, 1001-5000 employeesWorkForce Suite
- EmpCenter has reduced the amount of time administrators are spending on payroll. Certainly it has made our entry to our pay system more efficient since we can simply load the data from the time keeping system and we are not collecting actual physical signatures and paper timesheets that must be reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The system does this for us and some automatic calculating of certain pay due that we were hand adding. However the feedback I am getting is that the supervisors feel their work has been increased greatly. They are spending more time correcting and approving time. Essentially the work we were doing in our central offices to review and correct time the supervisor must now do as they approve the time. We have now asked them to be more responsible for proper reporting and use which requires they know more about the rules and many different aspects of pay than they had before. We have employees who are union represented and get some benefits from the contract others do not receive, contract employees who have certain pay aspects in their contracts that must be known, as well as temporary employees and students who get very different pay from the other employees. While some things have been programmed for the system to know and handle, some things must be added to the time sheet to pay properly or the way time is reported is different (some clock out for lunch some don't) supervisors must now know these differences while that used to be a role that was more mine as an administrator. Now I just help them and audit and review.
Auxiliaries and Activities Business Center Payroll Coordinator
Oregon State UniversityHigher Education, 1001-5000 employees