Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
Sage 100 Contractor
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Sage 100 Contractor is a construction accounting and project management software. It is intended to provide primary accounting and other management capabilities across a construction project lifecycle, including estimating, service management, and reporting.
N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Sage 100 Contractor
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Sage 100 Contractor
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Sage 100 Contractor
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Sage 100 Contractor
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Sage 100 Contractor
8.0
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
6.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.8
4 Ratings
13% below category average
Sage 100 Contractor
7.6
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Dashboards
5.44 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Standard reports
7.04 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Custom reports
7.34 Ratings
6.45 Ratings
Data exportability
7.34 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
7.3
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Sage 100 Contractor
5.7
7 Ratings
29% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing
9.713 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
10.013 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.712 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.412 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
5.711 Ratings
5.66 Ratings
Document sharing
10.012 Ratings
5.84 Ratings
RFI tools
5.411 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
9.312 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
As-built drawings
5.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
3.011 Ratings
3.42 Ratings
Submittal design and management
7.010 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Checklists
5.74 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
9.02 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Specifications
6.44 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Change orders
8.02 Ratings
4.44 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
5.2
3 Ratings
40% below category average
Sage 100 Contractor
5.1
5 Ratings
42% below category average
Takeoff tools
5.73 Ratings
1.52 Ratings
Job costing
5.13 Ratings
5.95 Ratings
Cost databases
8.02 Ratings
7.15 Ratings
Cost calculator
4.13 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Bid creation
3.02 Ratings
4.82 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
Sage 100 Contractor
5.4
4 Ratings
34% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
4.73 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
5.34 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
6.14 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
3.43 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Bim 360 is well suited to the majority of construction projects in my opinion. On the construction side I could see how the straightforward nature of the platform would be well liked. The new update with the widgets is a great touch and allows for ease of site visits by showcasing good to know info like project location on a map and the local weather. You can also customize the "widgets" as you see fit to add more information if necessary to the home screen. From my experience as a LEED consultant, Bim 360 does not differ much from other platforms used for submittal review like Procore. It is easy enough to search for what you want but searches do take a while and you need to move the cursor over every time you search and do not find what you're looking for, which seems very unnecessary. Overall it is fine for reviewing documentation but isn't anything extraordinary.
If you want a SQL-based ERP, this is a great solution. You can host it locally or on a cloud-based SQL instance. If you want a more modern, browser and cloud-based system, Sage 100 Contractor will not work.
Sage integrates very well with our field time tracking software called Exaktime. We import the start/end time card data that includes job costs directly to the PR module which greatly reduces the time it takes to process payroll.
Sage 100 C payroll calculations and WC/GL overhead calculations are easy to use and understand. The WC/GL overhead calculations are posted to project costs in real-time allowing for accurate total cost reporting of the project.
Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
The cost of Sage 100 Contractor software is relatively inexpensive compared to some higher-priced options like Foundation and Microsoft Dynamics GP. But more importantly, the cost of implementing new software is costly. Implementation costs include testing and training. There are also risks involved with switching software such as missing data after conversion. Plus, there are always some unknown downsides to switching that are not apparent until the switch is made such as perceived capabilities that really don't exist. For these reasons, we will likely stay with Sage 100 Contractor for a long time. If we grow (say double) in size, we would consider other options.
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
In the end there are tons of other products that are much better. Time cards don't work, we needed an external software to track this for employees. Estimation is cumbersome, we just used Excel. Payroll was ok, but didn't do employee taxes correctly when they make a certain amount for some reason. Overall, it's a bad product.
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
If we ever have issues with Sage 100, the live chat is an awesome tool. However, most of our live chat inquiries are not because of the issues we have, but more for us to better understand how we are supposed to use the software. Sometimes we ask ourselves "what if we" and if we need guidance, the live chat will provide us with the answers or resources to figure out what we need. They always follow up to ensure the problems we encounter have been fixed. If our issue is an indicator of an upgrade that could be made, Sage 100 C offers a way to submit the idea for review and improvement of the software.
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists and punch lists created for us by others is optimal compared to the competition. We chose Bim360 over other options due to its ability to import out of other software programs directly into the system, adding reports in one location and then distributing it to subcontractors and internally from there to fix deficiencies. It does the tracking, importing, markups of pictures and document viewing well and fulfills our needs.
I have use Sage 50, Sage 90, Peachtree Quantum, QuickBooks, Great Plains. They are all good for what they can do. Sage 100 Contractor is the best at what it does. It's a good fit.
The fact that your files are not on your servers. Anytime that the Autodesk servers go down you are down; it does not happen very often but when it does there is nothing you can do about it except wait.
Because of how BIM360 licensing is setup it does force you to manage the personnel on a project closer. This can at times be viewed as a negative but in the long run is positive because with better management comes better profit.