Automox vs. GFI LanGuard

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management solution from the company of the same name in Boulder. Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single console. With it, IT and SecOps can gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure. Automox aims to reduce corporate risk while raising operational…
$2
per month per endpoint
GFI LanGuard
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
GFI LanGuard is software used to manage and maintain end-point protection across a network. It provides visibility into all the elements in the network, helping to assess where there may be potential vulnerabilities, and enables the administrator to patch them. It is a patch management and network auditing solution.N/A
Pricing
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFrom $2/mo per endpoint at volume—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Considered Both Products
Automox
Chose Automox
Couldn't depend on this solution to patch our devices. It was integrated with an ITSM and frankly it was useless.
Chose Automox
LanGuard is fine but the UI is clunky and it's not a cloud-based product. Automox is a nice tool for endpoints, however, not great for server patching IMO because it doesn't seem to patch in "real-time" as LanGuard does. I can monitor LanGuard's patching in real-time, I can see …
GFI LanGuard

No answer on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(61 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(25 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.6
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxGFI LanGuard
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox
Any company with remote users would benefit from Automox. The endpoint computer just needs to be powered on and connected to the internet for it to receive patches from the cloud. Via patch policies, patch deployment could also be automated with several scheduling options. It also has the ability to send software deployments to any computer
Read full review
GFI Software
-To track the vulnerability level of a windows network. -To push windows and other application updates from a central location. -Produce reports to highlight work being done to protect a network. In some organizations, you may have to prove for audit reasons you are enforcing policies put into place around cyber-security. This software can help you track work done on an ongoing basis for such purposes.
Read full review
Pros
Automox
  • Excellent support for Windows-based systems. Rarely have any issues updating those systems.
  • When issues do arise, the Automox support team has been very responsive and informative of solutions (or where projects are on potential roll out dates).
  • The user interface is intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
GFI Software
  • Install an agent to thoroughly scan machines to discover vulnerabilities.
  • Keeps there lists up-to-date with applications outside of windows and lets you know when an update is available.
Read full review
Cons
Automox
  • initial deployment of agents to all end points was a challenge, would have been great if there was a way for Automox to discover and install.
  • Sometimes upgrading the Automox client which becomes old due to an end point not connecting for a long time becomes challenging as it becomes incompatible and has to be upgraded manually
  • It would good to have a functionality where an end point device can be turned into a brick if desired in cases where the device is not returned back after an employee is terminated. This should also have the option of turning it back into an active device if we choose to
Read full review
GFI Software
  • It could be a bit of information overload which some things are shown can become noise. Maybe different levels of "security" for lack of a better term may be better where you have a summary vs detailed level when it comes to rating the vulnerability of the entire network.
  • I find I sometimes have issues with PCs on a different network accessed across a VPN where timeouts often occur with very large updates. This aspect can be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Automox
The system is really simple. We pushed the installer out through Group policy. Devices connected can get further defined by Tags or Groups.
Read full review
GFI Software
No answers on this topic
Usability
Automox
It is very easy to use. The package deployment is straight forward if you have even a little PowerShell knowledge. The reporting is very easy to use. The community behind it is great for asking questions, downloading working commands, and the support in general is very responsive
Read full review
GFI Software
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Automox
In my experience, they were responsive but the fixes were more like bandaids than a fix for the underlying problems which they admitted were on their end.
Read full review
GFI Software
I only tried to access there support once and it was a relatively pain-free process. They also have a lot of documentation available online which can be used to learn and tailor the software to suit your needs. It just takes time and effort to plan, execute and monitor going forward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Automox
We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any of that - it just happens silently in the background.
Read full review
GFI Software
WSUS was the other alternative I considered but I believe GFI takes updates, reporting, and functionality to a different level for an enterprise/medium-size business environment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Automox
  • Automox allows us to fix vulnerabilities in the shortest amount of time ever.
  • The automated patching and end point management features have made our jobs much easier.
  • We get to focus on more important tasks and not have to manually patch the operating systems.
Read full review
GFI Software
  • Certainty. It allows you to know where on your network needs attention.
  • Peace of mind. As security professionals, we can only put the necessary things in place to prevent malicious persons from exploiting a network. The software allows you to know whether or not your risk of exploitation is high or low. and if high what to do with it.
Read full review
ScreenShots